Artículo
The most vulnerable poor: clientelism among slum dwellers
Fecha de publicación:
04/2021
Editorial:
Springer
Revista:
Studies in Comparative International Development
ISSN:
0039-3606
e-ISSN:
1936-6167
Idioma:
Inglés
Tipo de recurso:
Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Resumen
Are slum dwellers more involved in clientelistic arrangements than other (urban poor) voters? While poverty is a key predictor of clientelism, some urban poor voters are more involved in clientelistic arrangements than others. Insecure tenure, lack of access to public resources, and location in areas exposed to environmental shocks increase the vulnerability of slum dwellers. This vulnerability is used by politicians and brokers, who politicize access to scarce resources, and thus make slum dweller more exposed to clientelism. The qualitative literature has long highlighted how clientelism provides a strategy for slum dwellers to cope with their vulnerability, but this population is often excluded from quantitative analyses of clientelism. Using survey data from Argentina and a matching technique that allows us to compare slum dwellers with similar non-slum dwellers, we find that there is indeed a higher prevalence of clientelism among the former. We use a survey experiment on monitoring and sanctions to show that this different exposure to clientelism is consequential. We find different responses across similarly poor slum dwellers and non-slum dwellers regarding the potential consequences of defecting from clientelistic arrangements. Our findings suggest that including slum dwellers in quantitative analyses would improve our understanding of clientelism.
Palabras clave:
ARGENTINA
,
CLIENTELISM
,
POVERTY
,
SLUMS
,
VULNERABILITY
Archivos asociados
Licencia
Identificadores
Colecciones
Articulos(SEDE CENTRAL)
Articulos de SEDE CENTRAL
Articulos de SEDE CENTRAL
Citación
Murillo, María Victoria; Oliveros, Virginia; Zarazaga, Rodrigo Esteban; The most vulnerable poor: clientelism among slum dwellers; Springer; Studies in Comparative International Development; 56; 3; 4-2021; 343-363
Compartir
Altmétricas