Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Ploschuk, Rocio Antonella
dc.contributor.author
Miralles, Daniel Julio
dc.contributor.author
Colmer, Timothy David
dc.contributor.author
Ploschuk, Edmundo Leonardo
dc.contributor.author
Striker, Gustavo Gabriel
dc.date.available
2022-08-02T12:09:55Z
dc.date.issued
2019-01
dc.identifier.citation
Ploschuk, Rocio Antonella; Miralles, Daniel Julio; Colmer, Timothy David; Ploschuk, Edmundo Leonardo; Striker, Gustavo Gabriel; Waterlogging of winter crops at early and late stages: Impacts on leaf physiology, growth and yield; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Plant Science; 871; 1-2019; 1863-1877
dc.identifier.issn
1664-462X
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/163841
dc.description.abstract
Waterlogging is expected to increase as a consequence of global climate change, constraining crop production in various parts of the world. This study assessed tolerance to 14-days of early- or late-stage waterlogging of the major winter crops wheat, barley, rapeseed and field pea. Aerenchyma formation in adventitious roots, leaf physiological parameters (net photosynthesis, stomatal and mesophyll conductances, chlorophyll fluorescence), shoot and root growth during and after waterlogging, and seed production were evaluated. Wheat produced adventitious roots with 20–22% of aerenchyma, photosynthesis was maintained during waterlogging, and seed production was 86 and 71% of controls for early- and late-waterlogging events. In barley and rapeseed, plants were less affected by early- than by late-waterlogging. Barley adventitious roots contained 19% aerenchyma, whereas rapeseed did not form aerenchyma. In barley, photosynthesis was reduced during early-waterlogging mainly by stomatal limitations, and by non-stomatal constraints (lower mesophyll conductance and damage to photosynthetic apparatus as revealed by chlorophyll fluorescence) during late-waterlogging. In rapeseed, photosynthesis was mostly reduced by non-stomatal limitations during early- and late-waterlogging, which also impacted shoot and root growth. Early-waterlogged plants of both barley and rapeseed were able to recover in growth upon drainage, and seed production reached ca. 79–85% of the controls, while late-waterlogged plants only attained 26–32% in seed production. Field pea showed no ability to develop root aerenchyma when waterlogged, and its photosynthesis (and stomatal and mesophyll conductances) was rapidly decreased by the stress. Consequently, waterlogging drastically reduced field pea seed production to 6% of controls both at early- and late-stages with plants being unable to resume growth upon drainage. In conclusion, wheat generates a set of adaptive responses to withstand 14 days of waterlogging, barley and rapeseed can still produce significant yield if transiently waterlogged during early plant stages but are more adversely impacted at the late stage, and field pea is not suitable for areas prone to waterlogging events of 14 days at either growth stage.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Frontiers Media
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
AERENCHYMA
dc.subject
CROPS
dc.subject
PHOTOSYNTHESIS
dc.subject
WATERLOGGING
dc.subject
YIELD
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura, Silvicultura y Pesca
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS
dc.title
Waterlogging of winter crops at early and late stages: Impacts on leaf physiology, growth and yield
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2020-12-15T14:17:30Z
dc.journal.volume
871
dc.journal.pagination
1863-1877
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ploschuk, Rocio Antonella. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Miralles, Daniel Julio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Colmer, Timothy David. University of Western Australia; Australia
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ploschuk, Edmundo Leonardo. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Striker, Gustavo Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Frontiers in Plant Science
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.01863/full
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01863
Archivos asociados