Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Rojas Ripari, Juan Manuel  
dc.contributor.author
Ursino, Cynthia Alejandra  
dc.contributor.author
Reboreda, Juan Carlos  
dc.contributor.author
de Marsico, Maria Cecilia  
dc.date.available
2022-08-01T22:56:29Z  
dc.date.issued
2019-03  
dc.identifier.citation
Rojas Ripari, Juan Manuel; Ursino, Cynthia Alejandra; Reboreda, Juan Carlos; de Marsico, Maria Cecilia; Innate development of acoustic signals for host parent–offspring recognition in the brood-parasitic Screaming Cowbird Molothrus rufoaxillaris; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Ibis; 161; 4; 3-2019; 717-729  
dc.identifier.issn
0019-1019  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/163768  
dc.description.abstract
Young birds communicate their need to parents through complex begging displays that include visual and acoustic cues. Nestlings of interspecific brood parasites must ‘tune’ into these communication channels to secure parental care from their hosts. Various studies show that parasitic nestlings can effectively manipulate host parental behaviour through their begging calls, but how these manipulative acoustic signals develop in growing parasites remains poorly understood. We investigated the influence of social experience on begging call development in a host-specialist brood parasite, the Screaming Cowbird Molothrus rufoaxillaris. Screaming Cowbird nestlings look and sound similar to those of the primary host, the Greyish Baywing Agelaioides badius. This resemblance is likely to be adaptive because Baywings discriminate against fledglings unlike their own and provision nests at higher rates in response to Baywing-like begging calls than to non-mimetic begging calls. By means of cross-fostering and playback experiments, we tested whether the acoustic cues that elicit recognition by Baywings develop innately in Screaming Cowbird nestlings or are acquired through social experience with host parents or nest mates. Our results suggest that begging call structure was partially modulated by experience because Baywing-reared Screaming Cowbird and host nestlings were acoustically more similar as age increased, whereas acoustic similarity between cross-fostered and Baywing-reared Screaming Cowbird nestlings decreased from 4–5 to 8–10 days of age. Cross-fostered Screaming Cowbirds developed begging calls of lower minimum frequency and broader bandwidth than those of Baywing-reared Screaming Cowbirds by the age of 8–10 days. Despite the observed differences in begging call structure, however, adult Baywings responded similarly to begging calls of 8- to 10-day-old cross-fostered and Baywing-reared Screaming Cowbirds, suggesting that these were functionally equivalent from the host's perspective. These findings support the idea that, although rearing environment can influence certain begging call parameters, the acoustic cues that serve for offspring recognition by Baywings develop in young Screaming Cowbirds independently of social experience.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
BEGGING CALL  
dc.subject
BROOD PARASITISM  
dc.subject
VOCAL DEVELOPMENT  
dc.subject
VOCAL MIMICRY  
dc.subject.classification
Zoología, Ornitología, Entomología, Etología  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Innate development of acoustic signals for host parent–offspring recognition in the brood-parasitic Screaming Cowbird Molothrus rufoaxillaris  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2020-11-20T14:49:47Z  
dc.journal.volume
161  
dc.journal.number
4  
dc.journal.pagination
717-729  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rojas Ripari, Juan Manuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ursino, Cynthia Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Reboreda, Juan Carlos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: de Marsico, Maria Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Ibis  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ibi.12672  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12672