Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Monzon, Juan Pablo  
dc.contributor.author
Cafaro la Menza, Nicolás  
dc.contributor.author
Cerrudo, Anibal Alejandro  
dc.contributor.author
Canepa, Matias  
dc.contributor.author
Rattalino Edreira, Juan Ignacio  
dc.contributor.author
Specht, James  
dc.contributor.author
Andrade, Fernando Héctor  
dc.contributor.author
Grassini, Patricio  
dc.date.available
2022-08-01T15:49:22Z  
dc.date.issued
2021-02  
dc.identifier.citation
Monzon, Juan Pablo; Cafaro la Menza, Nicolás; Cerrudo, Anibal Alejandro; Canepa, Matias; Rattalino Edreira, Juan Ignacio; et al.; Critical period for seed number determination in soybean as determined by crop growth rate, duration, and dry matter accumulation; Elsevier Science; Field Crops Research; 261; 2-2021; 1-8  
dc.identifier.issn
0378-4290  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/163708  
dc.description.abstract
Seed number (SN) is positively associated with aboveground dry matter (ADM) accumulation in most crop species. In soybean, there are discrepancies among studies relative to the start and end of the critical period for seed number determination. The objective of this study was to more precisely identify those two stages. To do so, we followed two approaches: (i) analyses of experimental data where differences in SN occurred as a result of variation in crop growth due to weather and management practices and (ii) review of published experiments where soybean was subjected to artificial stresses during specific crop phases. Following the first approach, we analyzed the relationships between SN versus ADM accumulation and its components, crop growth rate (CGR) and duration, for different reproductive phases using data from experiments that portrayed a wide range of environments and management practices. In the second approach, we compared SN values in stressed versus non-stressed treatments. Accumulated ADM during the R3 to R6 phase explained ca. 70 % of the variation in SN across experiments. The CGR during R3-R6 was also a good predictor of SN, but it had lower explanatory power compared with accumulated ADM, because CGR did not account for changes in duration of critical period across experiments. Review of published data, wherein soybean crops were subjected to artificial stresses during different reproductive phases, confirmed that the R3-R6 phase is a critical phase for SN determination in soybean. Key findings of this study were: (i) critical period for SN determination in soybean occurs during the R3-R6 phase and (ii) accumulated ADM during the critical period is a better predictor of SN compared with CGR because it accounts for differences in the duration of the critical period as a result of weather and management.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
CRITICAL PERIOD  
dc.subject
SEED NUMBER  
dc.subject
SOYBEAN  
dc.subject
YIELD  
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura  
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura, Silvicultura y Pesca  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Critical period for seed number determination in soybean as determined by crop growth rate, duration, and dry matter accumulation  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2022-03-08T20:58:46Z  
dc.journal.volume
261  
dc.journal.pagination
1-8  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Monzon, Juan Pablo. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cafaro la Menza, Nicolás. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cerrudo, Anibal Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Canepa, Matias. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rattalino Edreira, Juan Ignacio. Crop Consultant; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Specht, James. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Andrade, Fernando Héctor. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Grassini, Patricio. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Field Crops Research  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.108016  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429020313009