Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Amador Rodriguez, Rafael Yecid  
dc.contributor.author
Aduriz Bravo, Agustin  
dc.contributor.author
Valencia Cobo, Jorge Alberto  
dc.contributor.author
Reinoso Tapia, Roberto  
dc.contributor.author
Delgado Iglesias, Jaime  
dc.date.available
2022-07-20T13:06:20Z  
dc.date.issued
2021-08  
dc.identifier.citation
Amador Rodriguez, Rafael Yecid; Aduriz Bravo, Agustin; Valencia Cobo, Jorge Alberto; Reinoso Tapia, Roberto; Delgado Iglesias, Jaime; Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science; OmniaScience; Journal of Technology and Science Education; 11; 2; 8-2021; 403-418  
dc.identifier.issn
2014-5349  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/162623  
dc.description.abstract
This article presents the results of a piece of research that analyzed the views on the nature of science (NOS) among student teachers enrolled in programs of Primary Education at two public universities in Spain. Previous studies have reported that science teachers maintain ‘eclectic’ epistemological perspectives on science; in this article, we test if such a hypothesis holds when teachers’ NOS ideas are ‘anchored’ in specific periods and topics of the philosophy of science. We studied 114 prospective teachers attending an undergraduate teaching course with emphasis on the natural sciences at the Universities of Burgos and Valladolid in the period of 2017-18. A Likert-scale questionnaire with 37 items was applied to determine trends in those teachers’ epistemological views on science. The results showed that teachers’ views are mostly correlated with the philosophical period of Logical Positivism/Received View, and to some extent to the period of Recent and Contemporary Accounts. Regarding the classical epistemological topics of correspondence, methodologies, intervention, evolution and representation, teachers’ views could be related to the period of Logical Positivism/Received View and Critical Rationalism, but also to the New Philosophy of Science. The main conclusion of this study is that teachers’ expressed views on NOS are epistemologically eclectic to a much smaller degree when examined with more details concerning specific periods and topics of the philosophy of science.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
OmniaScience  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
EPISTEMOLOGICAL PROFILE  
dc.subject
EPISTEMOLOGICAL VIEWS  
dc.subject
NATURE OF SCIENCE  
dc.subject
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE  
dc.subject
SCIENCE TEACHERS  
dc.subject.classification
Educación General  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Educación  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES  
dc.title
Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2022-07-15T14:47:50Z  
dc.identifier.eissn
2013-6374  
dc.journal.volume
11  
dc.journal.number
2  
dc.journal.pagination
403-418  
dc.journal.pais
España  
dc.journal.ciudad
Barcelona  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Amador Rodriguez, Rafael Yecid. Universidad del Norte; Colombia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Aduriz Bravo, Agustin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Centro de Formación e Investigación en Enseñanza de las Ciencias; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Valencia Cobo, Jorge Alberto. Universidad del Norte; Colombia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Reinoso Tapia, Roberto. Universidad de Valladolid; España  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Delgado Iglesias, Jaime. Universidad de Valladolid; España  
dc.journal.title
Journal of Technology and Science Education  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse/article/view/1271  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1271