Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Baldassini, Pablo  
dc.contributor.author
Paruelo, José  
dc.date.available
2022-06-30T04:05:28Z  
dc.date.issued
2020-02  
dc.identifier.citation
Baldassini, Pablo; Paruelo, José; Deforestation and current management practices reduce soil organic carbon in the semi-arid Chaco, Argentina; Elsevier; Agricultural Systems; 178; 102749; 2-2020; 1-18  
dc.identifier.issn
0308-521X  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/160856  
dc.description.abstract
The soil is a fundamental component of the C cycle. Land use changes can alter the soil organic carbon (SOC) content, a key determinant of several regulation ecosystem services. Here, we analyzed the effects of land cover (e.g. from forest to cropland) and land use (i.e. management practices) change on SOC in the semi-arid Chaco of Argentina, a global deforestation hotspot. Using the CENTURY model, we analyzed SOC changes over 20 years for two sites with contrasting rainfall (600 and 800 mm). For each site, we evaluated the effect of different combination of management practices (e.g. fertilization, grazing intensity) and land uses (i.e. annual crops and sown pastures). 98.5% of the simulations performed for cropping systems showed a reduction in SOC, with an average reduction of 25% respect to the native forest. Wheat proportion in the crop rotation had the highest relative influence on SOC variation (54%), higher than the proportion of maize (26.4%) and nitrogen fertilization (9.8%). For sown pastures, <40% of the simulations showed SOC decreases up to 18%. Grazing intensity had the greatest relative influence on SOC variation in both sites (>60%), followed by burning (19%), temporary exclusion of cattle (12%) and nitrogen fertilization (4.3%). In most cases SOC changes were mainly explained by changes in C inputs (i.e. NPP) rather than by changes in outputs (i.e. respiration and erosion). Therefore, delta SOC showed a strong negative relationship with the Human Appropriation of NPP (R2 = 0.54 and 0.67 in cropping systems and pastures, respectively). Overall, our results suggest that land use change has negative effects on SOC regardless of the management practices implemented. The few combinations that balanced food production and carbon sequestration were maize monocultures with annual N fertilization, and cattle raising with temporary exclusion and burning suppression. Our results may be used to define management practices that allow maintaining soil carbon stocks in the upper soil layer.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
CENTURY  
dc.subject
HANPP  
dc.subject
LAND USE CHANGE  
dc.subject
NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION  
dc.subject
SOIL ORGANIC CARBON  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Agrícolas  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Agrícolas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Deforestation and current management practices reduce soil organic carbon in the semi-arid Chaco, Argentina  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2021-09-07T15:21:56Z  
dc.journal.volume
178  
dc.journal.number
102749  
dc.journal.pagination
1-18  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Baldassini, Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Paruelo, José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias; Uruguay. Universidad de la República; Uruguay  
dc.journal.title
Agricultural Systems  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102749  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308521X19304706