Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Fuentes, Mariana Elisabet  
dc.contributor.author
Lloberas, Maria Mercedes  
dc.contributor.author
Luque, Sonia Elisabet  
dc.contributor.author
Bernat, Gisele  
dc.contributor.author
Riva, Eliana  
dc.contributor.author
Fiel, Cesar Alberto  
dc.contributor.author
Fernández, Alicia Silvina  
dc.date.available
2022-04-27T17:13:40Z  
dc.date.issued
2021  
dc.identifier.citation
A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattle; 28th Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology; Irlanda; 2021; 1-2  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/155890  
dc.description.abstract
Anthelmintic resistance in beef cattle production is a well-known worldwide problem, contributing to the economic losses caused by gastrointestinal nematodes. Resistance to ivermectin (IVM) is present in 93.5% of farms in Argentina, Cooperia spp. being the most prevalent genus (100%). Diagnosing AR under field conditions is currently done using the faecal egg count reduction test, which has been long used but lacks sensitivity to detect resistance in its early stages. In trying to improve this, in vitro techniques have been developed for different compounds and different parasites, and tested mainly in sheep parasites. As part of a large study on IVM-resistant populations of Cooperia spp. in beef farms, this assay was designed to evaluate two in vitro techniques, the micro-agar larval development test (MALDT) and the larval migration inhibition test (LMIT), on proven resistant (R) and susceptible (S) field populations. Both populations had been previously characterised by controlled-efficacy tests, showing that the efficacy of ivermectin against R and Se Cooperia was 66.3% and 99.5%, respectively. For the MALDT, eggs of both Cooperia isolates were exposed to twelve anthelmintic concentrations, from 4.7x10⁻¹⁰M to 2.18x10⁻¹¹M. The obtained EC50 values were: 6.93x10-9M (95%CI: 6.37x10⁻⁹M to 7.49x10⁻⁹M) for the R population and 8.33x10-10M (95%CI: 7.86x10⁻¹⁰M to 8.8x10⁻¹⁰M) for the S one, with correlation coefficients (R²) of 0.92 y 0.93, respectively; the resistance factor (RF) was 8.31. For the LMIT, ensheathed L3 were exposed to eight concentrations, from 10⁻⁵M a 5x10⁻⁹M. The EC50 values were 6.33x10-8M (95%CI: 5.30x10-8M to 7.49x10-8M) for the R population, and 8.03x10-8M (95%CI: 5.49x10-8M ? 1,19x10-7M) for the S population, with R² of 0.87 y 0.52, respectively; and a RF of 0.79. Based on these preliminary results, the MALDT would be a useful in vitro technique to detect field populations of IVM-resistant Cooperia nematodes.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
University College Dublin  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
IN VITRO TECHNIQUES  
dc.subject
IVERMECTIN  
dc.subject
RESISTANCE  
dc.subject
COOPERIA  
dc.subject
CATTLE  
dc.subject
LARVAL DEVELOPMENT TEST  
dc.subject
LARVAL MIGRATION INHIBITION TEST  
dc.subject
GASTROINTESTINAL NEMATODES  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.subject.classification
Ganadería  
dc.subject.classification
Producción Animal y Lechería  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
A comparison between two in vitro techniques to detect resistance to ivermectin in field populations of Cooperia spp. in cattle  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/documento de conferencia  
dc.date.updated
2022-04-07T17:18:38Z  
dc.journal.pagination
1-2  
dc.journal.pais
Irlanda  
dc.journal.ciudad
Dublin  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Fuentes, Mariana Elisabet. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lloberas, Maria Mercedes. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Luque, Sonia Elisabet. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bernat, Gisele. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Riva, Eliana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Fiel, Cesar Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Fernández, Alicia Silvina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.waavp2021.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/WAAVP-2021-Abstract-book-22.07.21-FINAL.pdf  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.waavp2021.com/  
dc.conicet.rol
Autor  
dc.conicet.rol
Autor  
dc.conicet.rol
Autor  
dc.conicet.rol
Autor  
dc.conicet.rol
Autor  
dc.conicet.rol
Autor  
dc.conicet.rol
Autor  
dc.coverage
Internacional  
dc.type.subtype
Conferencia  
dc.description.nombreEvento
28th Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology  
dc.date.evento
2021-07-19  
dc.description.paisEvento
Irlanda  
dc.type.publicacion
Book  
dc.description.institucionOrganizadora
University College Dublin  
dc.description.institucionOrganizadora
Trinity College Dublin  
dc.description.institucionOrganizadora
Queen’s University Belfast  
dc.source.libro
Book of Abstracts: 28th Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology  
dc.date.eventoHasta
2021-07-22  
dc.type
Conferencia