Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Ovando, Ximena Maria Constanza  
dc.contributor.author
Miranda, Maria Jose  
dc.contributor.author
Loyola, Rafael  
dc.contributor.author
Cuezzo, Maria Gabriela  
dc.date.available
2021-12-09T12:45:37Z  
dc.date.issued
2019-08  
dc.identifier.citation
Ovando, Ximena Maria Constanza; Miranda, Maria Jose; Loyola, Rafael; Cuezzo, Maria Gabriela; Identifying priority areas for invertebrate conservation using land snails as models; Elsevier Gmbh; Journal for Nature Conservation; 50; 8-2019; 1-38  
dc.identifier.issn
1617-1381  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/148467  
dc.description.abstract
Mollusca is a megadiverse phylum with an estimated number of 70,000–76,000 described species which can inhabit a wide variety of environments. Among them, land snails are a main component of terrestrial ecosystems and they play a pivotal role in ecosystem functioning. They are suffering habitat loss, overexploitation and competition from introduced species, but are regarded as a “non-charismatic” group for conservation purposes. Orthalicoidea is a dominant faunal element in the Neotropics and in Argentina includes 104 species that inhabit a variety of environments. Their abundance, diversity, comprehensive taxonomy and widespread representation in different ecoregions makes this molluscan group an excellent model for biodiversity assessments. The database used here consisted of 985 unique geographic records of 104 species. Species distribution models were generated using the Maximum Entropy method and Zonation v 3.1 was used to evaluate the proposed conservation goals. Three analyses including species distributions, the current protected areas system (PAs) and the Human print layer were carried out. This allowed the identification of priority areas for conservation, the percentage of the species distribution under PAs and analysis of the potential impacts under current land use and in the priority areas detected above. Sixty-one species were modeled, and 59 of them were included in the priority area selection process due to their high area under curve (AUC) scores. Five high priority areas located in the different ecoregions, were identified: 1-dry Chaco, 2-humid Pampas, 3-Southern Andean Yungas, 4-Alto Paraná Atlantic Forests and 5-high Monte. A small percentage of the average distribution range of Orthalicoidean species (3%) was within the current protected areas. Highest-ranked priority areas for land snails are outside the current protected areas system. When human impact is considered, the priority areas are reduced in size and appear as small patches. However, highest priority areas for conservation continue being those detected in the above analyses. Most of the areas detected are used for economic purposes, creating conflicts of interest between the development of human activities and conservation. This study represents one of the first attempts to identify ecoregion level priority areas for a terrestrial invertebrate group. Further analyses, including new predictors and other molluscan taxa, would improve planning the conservation of poorly known invertebrate groups.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Gmbh  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
MOLLUSCA  
dc.subject
ORTHALICOIDEA  
dc.subject
PROTECTED AREAS  
dc.subject
SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELLING  
dc.subject
ZONATION  
dc.subject.classification
Conservación de la Biodiversidad  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Identifying priority areas for invertebrate conservation using land snails as models  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2020-11-19T21:47:15Z  
dc.journal.volume
50  
dc.journal.pagination
1-38  
dc.journal.pais
Alemania  
dc.journal.ciudad
Berlín  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ovando, Ximena Maria Constanza. Universidade do Estado de Rio do Janeiro; Brasil  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Miranda, Maria Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Loyola, Rafael. Universidade Federal de Goiás; Brasil  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cuezzo, Maria Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Journal for Nature Conservation  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2019.04.004  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S161713811730506X