Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Navarro, Pablo Eugenio
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.date.available
2021-11-18T15:21:46Z
dc.date.issued
2019-11
dc.identifier.citation
Navarro, Pablo Eugenio; Purity and constraints in legal theory. Some remarks on Paulson’s Analysis of the neo-Kantian dimension of Kelsenian theory of law; Edizioni ETS; Analisi e Diritto; 2019; 2; 11-2019; 31-40
dc.identifier.issn
1126-5779
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/147154
dc.description.abstract
Hans Kelsen rejects both natural law theories and fact-based positivism. Rather, following certain ideas inspired by the neo-Kantian philosophy, he attempts to preserve a clear separation between law and facts as well as between law and morality. As it is well-known, Kelsen?s Neo-Kantian ideas are combined with other theses extracted from a positivistic vision of the law. However, as Stanley L. Paulson shows in his very fine paper about the limits of the kelsenian doctrine, Neo-Kantism and positivism cannot be easily articulated in a coherent picture. In particular, Paulson analyses two closely connected problems. On the one hand, the relation between legal interpretation and the ?irregular? creation of norms (i.e., the problem of constraints) and, on the other hand, the limits of purity (i.e., the philosophical problem). In this paper, I will briefly comment on both problems mentioned by Paulson. First, I deal with the philosophical problem and I focus on (i) the distinction between ?Is? and ?Ought? and (ii) the rejection of Natural Law Theories. Second, I analyse the problem of constraints and I pay attention to certain consequences that stem from the validity of irregular norms.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Edizioni ETS
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Neo-Kantism
dc.subject
Legal Positivism
dc.subject
Pure Theory of Law
dc.subject.classification
Otras Derecho
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
Derecho
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.title
Purity and constraints in legal theory. Some remarks on Paulson’s Analysis of the neo-Kantian dimension of Kelsenian theory of law
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2020-11-19T21:10:19Z
dc.journal.volume
2019
dc.journal.number
2
dc.journal.pagination
31-40
dc.journal.pais
Italia
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.journal.ciudad
Pisa
dc.description.fil
Fil: Navarro, Pablo Eugenio. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Analisi e Diritto
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journal.edizioniets.com/index.php/aed/article/view/98
Archivos asociados