Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Vasen, Gustavo  
dc.contributor.author
Dunayevich, Paula  
dc.contributor.author
Constantinou, Andreas  
dc.contributor.author
Colman Lerner, Alejandro Ariel  
dc.date.available
2021-10-01T03:04:59Z  
dc.date.issued
2020-08-20  
dc.identifier.citation
Vasen, Gustavo; Dunayevich, Paula; Constantinou, Andreas; Colman Lerner, Alejandro Ariel; GPCR receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis are not necessary to switch polarized growth between internal cues during pheromone response in S. cerevisiae; Taylor & Francis; Communicative and Integrative Biology; 13; 1; 20-8-2020; 128-139  
dc.identifier.issn
1942-0889  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/142181  
dc.description.abstract
Chemotactic/chemotropic cells follow accurately the direction of gradients of regulatory molecules. Many G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) function as chemoattractant receptors to guide polarized responses. In “a” mating type yeast, the GPCR Ste2 senses the α-cell’s pheromone. Previously, phosphorylation and trafficking of this receptor have been implicated in the process of gradient sensing, where cells dynamically correct growth. Correction is often necessary since yeast have intrinsic polarity sites that interfere with a correct initial gradient decoding. We have recently showed that when actively dividing (not in G1) yeast are exposed to a uniform pheromone concentration, they initiate a pheromone-induced polarization next to the mother–daughter cytokinesis site. Then, they reorient their growth to the intrinsic polarity site. Here, to study if Ste2 phosphorylation and internalization are involved in this process, we generated receptor variants combining three types of mutated signals for the first time: phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and the NPFX1,2D Sla1-binding motif. We first characterized their effect on endocytosis and found that these processes regulate internalization in a more complex manner than previously shown. Interestingly, we showed that receptor phosphorylation can drive internalization independently of ubiquitylation and the NPFX1,2D motif. When tested in our assays, cells expressing either phosphorylation or endocytosis-deficient receptors were able to switch away from the cytokinesis site to find the intrinsic polarity site as efficiently as their WT counterparts. Thus, we conclude that these processes are not necessary for the reorientation of polarization.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Taylor & Francis  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
endocytosis  
dc.subject
GPCR  
dc.subject
polarization  
dc.subject
gradient sensing  
dc.subject.classification
Biología Celular, Microbiología  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
GPCR receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis are not necessary to switch polarized growth between internal cues during pheromone response in S. cerevisiae  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2021-09-07T18:38:50Z  
dc.journal.volume
13  
dc.journal.number
1  
dc.journal.pagination
128-139  
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Vasen, Gustavo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Dunayevich, Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Constantinou, Andreas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Colman Lerner, Alejandro Ariel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Communicative and Integrative Biology  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19420889.2020.1806667  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2020.1806667