Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Acevedo, Paloma  
dc.contributor.author
Cruces, Guillermo Antonio  
dc.contributor.author
Gertler, Paul  
dc.contributor.author
Martinez, Sebastian  
dc.date.available
2021-09-10T01:23:51Z  
dc.date.issued
2020-08  
dc.identifier.citation
Acevedo, Paloma; Cruces, Guillermo Antonio; Gertler, Paul; Martinez, Sebastian; How vocational education made women better off but left men behind; Elsevier; Labour Economics; 65; 8-2020; 1-14  
dc.identifier.issn
0927-5371  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/140049  
dc.description.abstract
This paper examines the interaction between vocational and soft skills training on labor market outcomes and expectations of youth in the Dominican Republic. Applicants to a training program were randomly assigned to one of three modalities: a full treatment consisting of vocational and soft skills training plus an internship, a partial treatment consisting of soft skills training plus an internship, or a control group with no training or internship. We find strong and lasting effects of the program on personal skills acquisition and expectations, but results are markedly different for men and women. Shortly after completing the program, all participants reported increased expectations for improved employment and livelihoods. This result is reversed for male participants after three and a half years, potentially explained by the program's negative short-run labor market effects for that group. On the other hand, female participants experience improved labor market outcomes in the short run and exhibit substantially higher levels of personal skills after three and a half years; the women in the study became more optimistic and reported higher self-esteem. Men experienced no such benefits. Our results suggest that job-training programs of this type can be transformative – for women, life skills mattered and made a difference. But they can also have a downside if, as was the case for men in this study, training creates expectations that are not met. Although, overall, impacts are similar for the full treatment and the partial treatment, the positive impacts on soft skills for women, and the adverse impacts on labor outcomes and expectations for men are stronger for the full treatment.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
COGNITIVE AND NON-COGNITIVE SKILLS  
dc.subject
FIELD EXPERIMENT  
dc.subject
JOB TRAINING  
dc.subject
VOCATIONAL EDUCATION  
dc.subject
YOUTH EMPLOYMENT  
dc.subject.classification
Economía, Econometría  
dc.subject.classification
Economía y Negocios  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES  
dc.title
How vocational education made women better off but left men behind  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2021-09-06T17:05:33Z  
dc.identifier.eissn
1879-1034  
dc.journal.volume
65  
dc.journal.pagination
1-14  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Acevedo, Paloma. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cruces, Guillermo Antonio. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Departamento de Ciencias Económicas. Centro de Estudios Distributivos Laborales y Sociales; Argentina. University of Nottingham; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gertler, Paul. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos. Buró Nacional de Investigación Económica; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Martinez, Sebastian. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados Unidos  
dc.journal.title
Labour Economics  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537120300294  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101824