Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Bravo, Adrian J.  
dc.contributor.author
Pearson, Matthew R.  
dc.contributor.author
Pilatti, Angelina  
dc.contributor.author
Mezquita, Laura  
dc.contributor.author
Ibañez, Manuel I.  
dc.contributor.author
Ortet, Generós  
dc.date.available
2021-07-01T19:50:29Z  
dc.date.issued
2018-03  
dc.identifier.citation
Bravo, Adrian J.; Pearson, Matthew R.; Pilatti, Angelina; Mezquita, Laura; Ibañez, Manuel I.; et al.; Ruminating in english, ruminating in spanish: Psychometric evaluation and validation of the ruminative thought style questionnaire in Spain, Argentina, and USA; Hogrefe Publishing GmbH; European Journal of Psychological Assessment; 35; 6; 3-2018; 779-790  
dc.identifier.issn
1015-5759  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/135317  
dc.description.abstract
The present study aimed to adapt and validate a Spanish version of the Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire (RTSQ) and test for measurement invariance of the RTSQ across college students in the US, Spain, and Argentina (n = 1,632). Additionally, we examined/compared across these countries, criterion-related (i.e., concurrent) validity of RTSQ factors (i.e., problem-focused thoughts, counterfactual thinking, repetitive thoughts, and anticipatory thoughts) on constructs theoretically-associated with rumination. Consistent with previous findings, we found that a 15-item 4-factor RTSQ provided a more adequate model compared to single-factor CFA models (15- and 20-item versions) in every country. The reliability and validity of the subscales for the Spanish version were satisfactory-to-good in Spain and Argentina. Using multigroup confirmatory factor analyses, we found the 15-item 4-factor version of the RTSQ to be invariant across countries and sex. Bivariate correlations provided evidence for the criterion-related validity of the 4-factor RTSQ across the countries. Our findings suggest that self-report items of the RTSQ convey the same meaning, and that responses to those items load onto the same set of factors, across languages and cultures of administration. Taken together, our findings serve as a foundation for future cross-cultural work testing models in which rumination is a central facet.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Hogrefe Publishing GmbH  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
COLLEGE STUDENTS  
dc.subject
CROSS-CULTURAL  
dc.subject
MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE  
dc.subject
PSYCHOMETRICS  
dc.subject
RUMINATION  
dc.subject
SEX DIFFERENCES  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Psicología  
dc.subject.classification
Psicología  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES  
dc.title
Ruminating in english, ruminating in spanish: Psychometric evaluation and validation of the ruminative thought style questionnaire in Spain, Argentina, and USA  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2021-06-16T15:18:24Z  
dc.identifier.eissn
2151-2426  
dc.journal.volume
35  
dc.journal.number
6  
dc.journal.pagination
779-790  
dc.journal.pais
Canadá  
dc.journal.ciudad
Toronto  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bravo, Adrian J.. University of New Mexico; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pearson, Matthew R.. University of New Mexico; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pilatti, Angelina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudio sobre Cultura y Sociedad. Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Psicología - Grupo Vinculado CIPSI; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mezquita, Laura. Universitat Jaume I; España  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ibañez, Manuel I.. Universitat Jaume I; España  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ortet, Generós. Universitat Jaume I; España  
dc.journal.title
European Journal of Psychological Assessment  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1015-5759/a000465  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000465  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-15928-001