Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Lieberoth, Andreas  
dc.contributor.author
Lin, Shiang Yi  
dc.contributor.author
Stöckli, Sabrina  
dc.contributor.author
Han, Hyemin  
dc.contributor.author
Kowal, Marta  
dc.contributor.author
Gelpi, Rebekah  
dc.contributor.author
Chrona, Stavroula  
dc.contributor.author
Tran, Thao Phuong  
dc.contributor.author
Jeftić, Alma  
dc.contributor.author
Rasmussen, Jesper  
dc.contributor.author
Cakal, Huseyin  
dc.contributor.author
Milfont, Taciano L.  
dc.contributor.author
Reyna, Cecilia  
dc.contributor.author
The COVIDiSTRESS global survey consortium  
dc.date.available
2021-06-03T18:22:45Z  
dc.date.issued
2021-02  
dc.identifier.citation
Lieberoth, Andreas; Lin, Shiang Yi; Stöckli, Sabrina; Han, Hyemin; Kowal, Marta; et al.; Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: Relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey; Royal Society Publishig; Royal Society Open Science; 8; 2; 2-2021; 1-33  
dc.identifier.issn
2054-5703  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/133158  
dc.description.abstract
The COVIDiSTRESS global survey collects data on early human responses to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic from 173 429 respondents in 48 countries. The open science study was co-designed by an international consortium of researchers to investigate how psychological responses differ across countries and cultures, and how this has impacted behaviour, coping and trust in government efforts to slow the spread of the virus. Starting in March 2020, COVIDiSTRESS leveraged the convenience of unpaid online recruitment to generate public data. The objective of the present analysis is to understand relationships between psychological responses in the early months of global coronavirus restrictions and help understand how different government measures succeed or fail in changing public behaviour. There were variations between and within countries. Although Western Europeans registered as more concerned over COVID-19, more stressed, and having slightly more trust in the governments' efforts, there was no clear geographical pattern in compliance with behavioural measures. Detailed plots illustrating between-countries differences are provided. Using both traditional and Bayesian analyses, we found that individuals who worried about getting sick worked harder to protect themselves and others. However, concern about the coronavirus itself did not account for all of the variances in experienced stress during the early months of COVID-19 restrictions. More alarmingly, such stress was associated with less compliance. Further, those most concerned over the coronavirus trusted in government measures primarily where policies were strict. While concern over a disease is a source of mental distress, other factors including strictness of protective measures, social support and personal lockdown conditions must also be taken into consideration to fully appreciate the psychological impact of COVID-19 and to understand why some people fail to follow behavioural guidelines intended to protect themselves and others from infection. The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) on 18 May 2020. Following IPA, the accepted Stage 1 version of the manuscript was preregistered on the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/ytbcs. This preregistration was performed prior to data analysis.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Royal Society Publishig  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
COMPLIANCE BEHAVIOUR  
dc.subject
COVID-19  
dc.subject
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY  
dc.subject
STRESS  
dc.subject
TRUST  
dc.subject
WORRY  
dc.subject.classification
Psicología  
dc.subject.classification
Psicología  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES  
dc.title
Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: Relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2021-06-03T14:45:51Z  
dc.journal.volume
8  
dc.journal.number
2  
dc.journal.pagination
1-33  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lieberoth, Andreas. University Aarhus; Dinamarca  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lin, Shiang Yi. University of Hong Kong; China  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Stöckli, Sabrina. University of Bern; Suiza  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Han, Hyemin. University of Alabama at Birmingahm; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kowal, Marta. Wroclaw University; Polonia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gelpi, Rebekah. University of Toronto; Canadá  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Chrona, Stavroula. King's College London; Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Tran, Thao Phuong. State University of Colorado at Boulder; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Jeftić, Alma. International Christian University; Japón  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rasmussen, Jesper. University Aarhus; Dinamarca  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cakal, Huseyin. Keele University.; Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Milfont, Taciano L.. University of Waikato; Nueva Zelanda  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Reyna, Cecilia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: The COVIDiSTRESS global survey consortium. No especifíca;  
dc.journal.title
Royal Society Open Science  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.200589  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200589