Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Amigo, Natalia
dc.contributor.author
Riganti, Juan Martin
dc.contributor.author
Ramirez, Mauricio
dc.contributor.author
Lorenzi, Andrea
dc.contributor.author
Renda, Pedro
dc.contributor.author
Lovera, Romina
dc.contributor.author
Pascaner, Ariel Fernando
dc.contributor.author
Vigliano, Carlos
dc.contributor.author
Craiem, Damian
dc.contributor.author
Gilbert, Thomas W.
dc.contributor.author
Remlinger, Nathaniel T.
dc.contributor.author
Nieponice, Alejandro
dc.date.available
2021-05-06T17:35:08Z
dc.date.issued
2020-05
dc.identifier.citation
Amigo, Natalia; Riganti, Juan Martin; Ramirez, Mauricio; Lorenzi, Andrea; Renda, Pedro; et al.; Urinary Bladder Matrix Scaffolds Promote Pericardium Repair in a Porcine Model; Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science; Journal Of Surgical Research; 249; 5-2020; 216-224
dc.identifier.issn
0022-4804
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/131536
dc.description.abstract
Pericardium closure after cardiac surgery is recommended to prevent postoperative adhesions to the sternum. Synthetic materials have been used as substitutes, with limited results because of impaired remodeling and fibrotic tissue formation. Urinary bladder matrix (UBM) scaffolds promote constructive remodeling that more closely resemble the native tissue. The aim of the study is to evaluate the host response to UBM scaffolds in a porcine model of partial pericardial resection. Twelve Landrace pigs were subjected to a median sternotomy. A 5 × 7 cm pericardial defect was created and then closed with a 5 × 7 cm multilayer UBM patch (UBM group) or left as an open defect (control group). Animals were survived for 8 wk. End points included gross morphology, biomechanical testing, histology with semiquantitative score, and cardiac function. The UBM group showed mild adhesions, whereas the control group showed fibrosis at the repair site, with robust adhesions and injury to the coronary bed. Load at failure (gr) and stiffness (gr/mm) were lower in the UBM group compared with the native pericardium (199.9 ± 59.2 versus 405.3 ± 99.89 g, P = 0.0536 and 44.23 ± 15.01 versus 146.5 ± 24.38 g/mm, P = 0.0025, respectively). In the UBM group, the histology resembled native pericardial tissue, with neovascularization, neofibroblasts, and little inflammatory signs. In contrast, control group showed fibrotic tissue with mononuclear infiltrates and a lack of organized collagen fibers validated with a histologic score. Both groups had normal ultrasonography results without cardiac motility disorders. In this setting, UBM scaffolds showed appropriate features for pericardial repair, restoring tissue properties that could help reduce postsurgical adhesions and prevent its associated complications.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
BIOLOGICAL SCAFFOLD
dc.subject
EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX
dc.subject
PERICARDIUM REPAIR
dc.subject
REGENERATIVE MEDICINE
dc.subject
URINARY BLADDER MATRIX
dc.subject.classification
Anatomía y Morfología
dc.subject.classification
Medicina Básica
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Y DE LA SALUD
dc.title
Urinary Bladder Matrix Scaffolds Promote Pericardium Repair in a Porcine Model
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2021-04-28T21:38:16Z
dc.journal.volume
249
dc.journal.pagination
216-224
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Amigo, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Riganti, Juan Martin. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ramirez, Mauricio. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lorenzi, Andrea. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Renda, Pedro. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lovera, Romina. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pascaner, Ariel Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Vigliano, Carlos. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Craiem, Damian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gilbert, Thomas W.. University of Pittsburgh; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Remlinger, Nathaniel T.. University of Pittsburgh; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Nieponice, Alejandro. University of Pittsburgh; Estados Unidos
dc.journal.title
Journal Of Surgical Research
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022480420300111
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.033
Archivos asociados