Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Godoy, Gloria Janet  
dc.contributor.author
Paira, Daniela Andrea  
dc.contributor.author
Olivera, Carolina  
dc.contributor.author
Breser, Maria Laura  
dc.contributor.author
Sanchez, Leonardo Rodolfo  
dc.contributor.author
Motrich, Ruben Dario  
dc.contributor.author
Rivero, Virginia Elena  
dc.date.available
2021-05-06T01:40:15Z  
dc.date.issued
2020-07  
dc.identifier.citation
Godoy, Gloria Janet; Paira, Daniela Andrea; Olivera, Carolina; Breser, Maria Laura; Sanchez, Leonardo Rodolfo; et al.; Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c mice; Elsevier Science; Immunology Letters; 223; 7-2020; 17-25  
dc.identifier.issn
0165-2478  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/131418  
dc.description.abstract
Foxp3+ Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are essential for the maintenance of tolerance to self. Therefore, it is expected that lower numbers and/or less than optimal function could impact on the functioning of the immune system, and thereby contributing to the development of autoimmune diseases. In the present report, by comparing Tregs from most frequently used mouse strains in immunological research (C57BL/6 (B6), BALB/c and NOD), we provide evidence showing that the NOD mouse strain, highly predisposed to develop autoimmune responses, exhibit a generalized decreased in Tregs counts with enhanced proportions of CD44hiCD62Llow Tregs when compared with BALB/c mice. No major differences were observed in Helios+ or Helios- Tregs between strains. The expression of CXCR3, CCR5 and CCR6 on Tregs from all strains showed minor proportions of CXCR3+ and CCR5+ cells in NOD Tregs. Naïve CD4+CD25- T cells from NOD mice also showed decreased capacity to induce in vitro iTregs when compared with B6 and BALB/c mice. Lower expression of molecules involved in Treg suppressor mechanisms such as CD25, LAP-1, CD39 and PD-1 was observed both in NOD iTregs and Tregs from lymph nodes of NOD mice. Moreover, in vitro assays showed that Tregs from NOD mice exhibited reduced ability to suppress proliferation of CD4+CD25- responder T cells when compared with B6 and BALB/c mice. Major differences were consistently observed between NOD and BALB/c mice, whereas no major differences were found for many of the analyzed parameters between the NOD and B6 mice, suggesting that highly and mildly autoimmune prone mouse strains may share some Tregs features. On the contrary, BALB/c Tregs were in major quantities, expressed higher levels of Foxp3 and exhibited more potent ability to inhibit effector T cell proliferation, data that could be related to its natural resistance to the induction of different experimental autoimmune conditions. Altogether our results demonstrate a generalized Treg cell dysfunction in NOD mice, a strain characterized by its high predisposition to develop spontaneous and induced autoimmune diseases.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
CHEMOKINE RECEPTORS  
dc.subject
ITREGS  
dc.subject
NAÏVE AND CENTRAL MEMORY TREGS  
dc.subject
NOD MICE  
dc.subject
REGULATORY T CELLS  
dc.subject.classification
Inmunología  
dc.subject.classification
Medicina Básica  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Y DE LA SALUD  
dc.title
Differences in T regulatory cells between mouse strains frequently used in immunological research: Treg cell quantities and subpopulations in NOD, B6 and BALB/c mice  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2021-04-28T22:00:44Z  
dc.journal.volume
223  
dc.journal.pagination
17-25  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Godoy, Gloria Janet. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Paira, Daniela Andrea. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Olivera, Carolina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Breser, Maria Laura. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Sanchez, Leonardo Rodolfo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Motrich, Ruben Dario. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rivero, Virginia Elena. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Immunology Letters  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165247819305826  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2020.04.006