Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Giorgis, Melisa Adriana
dc.contributor.author
Cingolani, Ana María
dc.contributor.author
Teich, Ingrid
dc.contributor.author
Poca, María
dc.date.available
2021-04-05T19:20:20Z
dc.date.issued
2019-12
dc.identifier.citation
Giorgis, Melisa Adriana; Cingolani, Ana María; Teich, Ingrid; Poca, María; Can livestock coexist with Polylepis australis forests in mountains of central Argentina? Setting thresholds for a land sharing landscape; Elsevier Science; Forest Ecology and Management; 457; 12-2019; 1-8
dc.identifier.issn
0378-1127
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/129399
dc.description.abstract
Developing a land sharing strategy requires a thorough understanding of what is the maximum productivity that can be achieved without altering key ecosystem processes. In the central Argentina highlands, Polylepis australis dominates the few remaining patches of forests and its evergreen trees are highly selected by domestic livestock. Grazing exclusion and low herbivory pressure allow P. australis forest expansion and soil conservation, while high herbivory pressure promotes forest retraction and environment degradation. However, the extent to which stocking densities should be reduced to allow forest expansion and stand maturation is still unknown. We aimed at answering this question by studying 15 stands located in paddocks with different management, from grazing enclosures to heavily stocked. In 2003 we selected 12 trees less than 2 m tall at each stand. Almost annually along 10 years, for each tree we registered survival, and if alive, we measured the height and two perpendicular diameters of the canopy. We built indicators of vertical and horizontal biomass accumulation rate along the study period and calculated an average effective stocking density (i.e., animal units per ha of non-rocky surface, AU ha−1) for each stand. We found a piece-wise relationship with two pieces between the accumulation rate of each biomass component and average stocking density. Biomass accumulation was maximum under grazing exclusion (i.e. zero stocking density). Between zero and 0.21 AU ha−1 we detected a strongly negative relationship among stocking density and biomass accumulation. Effective stocking densities lower than 0.12 and 0.06 AU ha−1 promoted a widespread vertical and horizontal biomass accumulation, respectively. Stands with stocking densities higher than 0.21 AU ha−1, had null horizontal and vertical biomass accumulation and higher tree mortality. We suggest that effective stocking densities lower than 0.12 AU ha−1 allow a land sharing strategy in central Argentina highlands, ensuring the conservation of a traditional economic activity and the restoration of Polylepis australis forests. Additionally, in areas where Polylepis australis is absent we suggest active restoration without herbivory pressure. Finally, we suggest that these management recommendations may be studied and promoted throughout the extension of Polylepis spp. forests in South America.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
BIOMASS PRODUCTION
dc.subject
BROWSING MANAGEMENT
dc.subject
CONSERVATION
dc.subject
FOREST RESTORATION
dc.subject
GRAZING
dc.subject
LAND SHARING
dc.subject
RESTORATION
dc.subject
STOCKING DENSITIES
dc.subject
TREE GROWTH
dc.subject.classification
Conservación de la Biodiversidad
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS
dc.title
Can livestock coexist with Polylepis australis forests in mountains of central Argentina? Setting thresholds for a land sharing landscape
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2021-03-25T13:53:26Z
dc.journal.volume
457
dc.journal.pagination
1-8
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam
dc.description.fil
Fil: Giorgis, Melisa Adriana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cingolani, Ana María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Teich, Ingrid. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Cordoba. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios.; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Poca, María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Forest Ecology and Management
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112719317384?dgcid=coauthor
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117728
Archivos asociados