Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Zampini, Enzo German  
dc.contributor.author
Gallelli, Maria Florencia  
dc.contributor.author
Chaves, María Graciela  
dc.contributor.author
Neild, Deborah M.  
dc.contributor.author
Gambarotta, Mariana  
dc.contributor.author
Miragaya, Marcelo H.  
dc.contributor.author
Trasorras, Virginia Luz  
dc.date.available
2021-03-23T19:53:38Z  
dc.date.issued
2020-11-17  
dc.identifier.citation
Zampini, Enzo German; Gallelli, Maria Florencia; Chaves, María Graciela; Neild, Deborah M.; Gambarotta, Mariana; et al.; Uterine and corpus luteum blood flow evaluation prior to uterine flushing in llama embryo donors; Frontiers Media S.A.; Frontiers in Veterinary Science; 7; 597960; 17-11-2020; 1-8  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/128842  
dc.description.abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the uterine blood flow (UBF) and corpus luteum blood flow (CLBF) in llamas 8 days post-mating, using color-Doppler ultrasonography (CDU), to determine the possible relationship between vascularization and the presence of an embryo. Adult females (n = 25) were used to monitor ovarian dynamics by palpation and transrectal ultrasonography until detection of a ≥6 mm growing follicle. Females were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group I (n = 19), were mated and ovulation was induced by a single dose of buserelin (GnRH analog) that same day (Day 0); and Group II (n = 6), only ovulation was induced (control). On Day 8, UBF and CLBF were evaluated transrectally in both groups. The color-flow images obtained were analyzed with Image J1.52a software to determine the vascularization area and the percentage of corpus luteum with blood flow emission (CLBF%) together with the percentage for each uterine horn (UBF%). Statistical analysis was performed using an ANOVA test. In Group I, uterine flushing was performed to obtain the embryos, thus dividing the females into Group I+ (n = 10), when an embryo was recovered and Group I- (n = 9), when no embryo was recovered. Embryo recovery rate was 52.63% (10/19). In Group I+, UBF% was significantly higher compared to Group I- and Group II (P <0.05). UBF appears to be a good predictor for embryo presence, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9 and an optimal cut-off value of 9.37% (with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 88.9%). The CLBF% did not differ between groups (P > 0.05). In conclusion, it is possible to detect a local increase of UBF in the presence of an embryo on day 8 post-mating in llamas. This could be useful to achieve an early pregnancy diagnosis or to decide whether to carry out the uterine flushing in a llama embryo transfer program.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Frontiers Media S.A.  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
BIOTECHNOLOGIES  
dc.subject
CAMELIDS  
dc.subject
DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY  
dc.subject
EMBRYO TRANSFER  
dc.subject
PREGNANCY  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Uterine and corpus luteum blood flow evaluation prior to uterine flushing in llama embryo donors  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2021-03-05T18:46:59Z  
dc.identifier.eissn
2297-1769  
dc.journal.volume
7  
dc.journal.number
597960  
dc.journal.pagination
1-8  
dc.journal.pais
Suiza  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Zampini, Enzo German. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Area de Teriogenología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Investigacion y Tecnología en Reproducción Animal; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gallelli, Maria Florencia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Area de Teriogenología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Investigacion y Tecnología en Reproducción Animal; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Chaves, María Graciela. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Area de Teriogenología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Investigacion y Tecnología en Reproducción Animal; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Neild, Deborah M.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Area de Teriogenología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Investigacion y Tecnología en Reproducción Animal; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gambarotta, Mariana. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Miragaya, Marcelo H.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Area de Teriogenología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Investigacion y Tecnología en Reproducción Animal; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Trasorras, Virginia Luz. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Area de Teriogenología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Investigacion y Tecnología en Reproducción Animal; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Frontiers in Veterinary Science  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2020.597960/full  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.597960