Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Wilkinson, Anna  
dc.contributor.author
Hill, Paul  
dc.contributor.author
Vaieretti, Maria Victoria  
dc.contributor.author
Farrar, John  
dc.contributor.author
Jones, Davey  
dc.contributor.author
Bardgett, Richard  
dc.date.available
2017-02-07T15:08:18Z  
dc.date.issued
2015-01  
dc.identifier.citation
Wilkinson, Anna; Hill, Paul; Vaieretti, Maria Victoria; Farrar, John; Jones, Davey; et al.; Challenging the paradigm of nitrogen cycling: no evidence of in situ resource partitioning by coexisting plant species in grasslands of contrasting fertility; Wiley; Ecology and Evolution; 5; 2; 1-2015; 275-287  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/12634  
dc.description.abstract
In monoculture, certain plant species are able to preferentially utilize different nitrogen (N) forms, both inorganic and organic, including amino acids and peptides, thus forming fundamental niches based on the chemical form of N. Results from field studies, however, are inconsistent: Some showing that coexisting plant species predominantly utilize inorganic N, while others reveal distinct interspecies preferences for different N forms. As a result, the extent to which hypothetical niches are realized in nature remains unclear. Here, we used in situ stable isotope tracer techniques to test the idea, in temperate grassland, that niche partitioning of N based on chemical form is related to plant productivity and the relative availability of organic and inorganic N. We also tested in situ whether grassland plants vary in their ability to compete for, and utilize peptides,which have recently been shown to act as an N source for plants in strongly N-limited ecosystems. We hypothesized that plants would preferentially use NO3--N and NH4+-N over dissolved organic N in high-productivity grassland where inorganic N availability is high. On the other hand, in low-productivity grasslands, where the availability of dissolved inorganic N is low, and soil availability of dissolved organic N is greater, we predicted that plants would preferentially use N from amino acids and peptides, prior to microbial mineralization. Turves from two well-characterized grasslands of contrasting productivity and soil N availability were injected, in situ, with mixtures of 15N-labeled inorganic N (NO3- and NH4+) and 13C15N labeled amino acid (L-alanine) and peptide (L-tri-alanine). In order to measure rapid assimilation of these N forms by soil microbes and plants, the uptake of these substrates was traced within 2.5 hours into the shoots of the most abundant plant species, as well as roots and the soil microbial biomass. We found that, contrary to our hypothesis, the majority of plant species across both grasslands took up most N in the form of NH4+, suggesting that inorganic N is their predominant N source. However, we did find that organic N was a source of N which could be utilized by plant species at both sites, and in the low-productivity grassland, plants were able to capture some tri-alanine-N directly. Although our findings did not support the hypothesis that differences in the availability of inorganic and organic N facilitate resource partitioning in grassland, they do support the emerging view that peptides represent a significant, but until now neglected, component of the terrestrial N cycle.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Wiley  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen  
dc.subject
Dissolved Organic Nitrogen  
dc.subject
Grassland Productivity  
dc.subject
Nitrogen Cycling  
dc.subject
Nitrogen Partitioning  
dc.subject
Peptide  
dc.subject
Soil  
dc.subject.classification
Ecología  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Challenging the paradigm of nitrogen cycling: no evidence of in situ resource partitioning by coexisting plant species in grasslands of contrasting fertility  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2017-01-31T17:21:54Z  
dc.identifier.eissn
2045-7758  
dc.journal.volume
5  
dc.journal.number
2  
dc.journal.pagination
275-287  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Wilkinson, Anna. Lancaster University. Lancaster Environment Centre; Reino Unido. University Of Manchester; Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Hill, Paul. Bangor University. College of Natural Sciences; Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Vaieretti, Maria Victoria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (p); Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Farrar, John. Bangor University. College of Natural Sciences; Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Jones, Davey. Bangor University. College of Natural Sciences; Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bardgett, Richard. Lancaster University. Lancaster Environment Centre; Reino Unido. University Of Manchester; Reino Unido  
dc.journal.title
Ecology and Evolution  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1244  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.1244/abstract