Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Naishtat, Francisco  
dc.date.available
2021-02-11T01:27:47Z  
dc.date.issued
2019-02  
dc.identifier.citation
Naishtat, Francisco; Benjamin’s profane uses of theology: The invisible organon; Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Religions; 10; 2; 2-2019; 1-16  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/125373  
dc.description.abstract
Invisible, but suggestive and fruitful; deprived of any reference to doctrine or ultimate assertive foundations, but nevertheless used in Benjamin like written images, crystallized as “images of thought”; as doctrinally mute as it is heuristically audible, Benjamin’s use of theology reminds us of the ironical use that Jorge Luis Borges himself made of theology and metaphysics as part of his own poetic forms. As such, these images of thought are located both in the place of philosophical use and in the one of methodological cunning or Metis, across the various levels of the corpus: a metaphysics of experience, literary criticism, philosophy of language, theory of history and Marxism. Therefore, accepting that criticism (Kritik) is the visible organon and the object of Benjaminian philosophy, is not theology, then, its invisible organon? What seems to be particular to Benjamin, however, is the agonistic but nevertheless heuristic way in which he intends to use theology in order to upset, disarray, and deconstruct the established philosophy, and specially its dominant trends in the field of the theory of history: historicism, positivism, and the evolutionary Hegelian–Marxist philosophy of history. In this article we try to demonstrate how this theological perspective is applied to a Benjaminian grammar of time. We conclude agonistically, confronting the resulting Benjaminian notion of historical past against Heiddeger’s own vision of historical time.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
DISGUISE  
dc.subject
DISRUPTIVE  
dc.subject
HERESY  
dc.subject
HISTORICAL TIME  
dc.subject
INVISIBILITY  
dc.subject
LANGUAGE  
dc.subject
MARXISM  
dc.subject
MESSIANISM  
dc.subject
PAST  
dc.subject
REDEMPTIVENESS  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Filosofía, Étnica y Religión  
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Ética y Religión  
dc.subject.classification
HUMANIDADES  
dc.title
Benjamin’s profane uses of theology: The invisible organon  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2021-02-09T18:44:03Z  
dc.identifier.eissn
2077-1444  
dc.journal.volume
10  
dc.journal.number
2  
dc.journal.pagination
1-16  
dc.journal.pais
Suiza  
dc.journal.ciudad
Basilea  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Naishtat, Francisco. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones "Gino Germani"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Religions  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/2/93  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10020093