Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Huergo, María Ana Cristina  
dc.contributor.author
Thanh, Nguyen Thi Kim  
dc.date.available
2021-01-06T19:40:39Z  
dc.date.issued
2020-12-09  
dc.identifier.citation
Huergo, María Ana Cristina; Thanh, Nguyen Thi Kim; Current Advances on Diagnoses of COVID-19 and The Evaluation of Humoral Response; Royal Society of Chemistry; Analyst; 2020; 9-12-2020; 1-23  
dc.identifier.issn
0003-2654  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/121674  
dc.description.abstract
The new outbreak caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 started at the end of 2019 and was declared pandemic in March 2020. Since then, several diagnostic methods have been re-adapted and also improved from previous detections of SARS and MERS coronavirus. The best strategy to handle this situation seems to rely on a triad of detection methods: i) highly sensitive and specific techniques as gold standard method, ii) easier and faster point of care tests accessible for largepopulation screening and iii) serology assays to complement the direct detection and to use for surveillance. In this review, we assessed the techniques and tests described in literature, their advantages and disadvantages and the interpretation of results. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is undoubtedly the gold standard technique utilized not only for diagnostic but also as standard for comparison and validation of newer approaches. Other nucleic acid amplification methods have shown to be adequate as point of care (POC) diagnostic tests with similar performance as RT-qPCR. The analysis of seroconversion with immunotests shows the complexity of the immune response to COVID-19. The detection of antibodies anti-SARS-CoV-2 can also help to detect previously infected asymptomatic individuals with negative RT-qPCR test. Nevertheless, more controlled serology cohort studies should be performed as soon as possible to understand the immune response to SARS-CoV-2.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
SARS-COV-2  
dc.subject
COVID-19  
dc.subject
DIAGNOSES  
dc.subject
IMMUNE RESPONSE  
dc.subject
POINT OF CARE  
dc.subject.classification
Bioquímica y Biología Molecular  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Current Advances on Diagnoses of COVID-19 and The Evaluation of Humoral Response  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2021-01-05T14:25:41Z  
dc.journal.volume
2020  
dc.journal.pagination
1-23  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Cambridge  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Huergo, María Ana Cristina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisicoquímicas Teóricas y Aplicadas. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisicoquímicas Teóricas y Aplicadas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Thanh, Nguyen Thi Kim. University College London. Departament Of Chemistry; Estados Unidos  
dc.journal.title
Analyst  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2021/AN/D0AN01686A  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D0AN01686A