Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Adil, H.
dc.contributor.author
Gerguri, S.
dc.contributor.author
Durodola, J.
dc.contributor.author
Fellows, N.
dc.contributor.author
Bonatesta, F.
dc.contributor.author
Audebert, Fernando Enrique
dc.date.available
2020-12-23T14:25:01Z
dc.date.issued
2019-03
dc.identifier.citation
Adil, H.; Gerguri, S.; Durodola, J.; Fellows, N.; Bonatesta, F.; et al.; Comparative Study and Evaluation of Two Different Finite Element Models for Piston Design; IJERA; International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications; 9; 3-2019; 23-37
dc.identifier.issn
2248-9622
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/121109
dc.description.abstract
The exposure of pistons to extreme mechanical and thermal loads in modern combustion engines has necessitated the use of efficient and detailed analysis methods to facilitate their design. The finite element analysis has become a standard design optimisation tool for this purpose. In literature two different approaches have been suggested for reducing the geometry of the cylinder and crank slider mechanism,to idealise piston finite element analysis load models,whilst trying to maintain realistic boundaries to obtain accurate results. The most widely used geometry is the combination of piston and gudgeon pin while the second geometry includes some portion of the connecting rod?s small end and cylinder in addition to the piston and gudgeon pin.No clear analyses have been made in literature about the relative effectiveness of the two approaches in terms of model accuracy. In this work both approaches have been carried out and analysed with respect to a racing piston. The results suggest that the latter approach is more representative of the load conditions that the piston is subjected to in reality.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
IJERA
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Finite Element Analysis
dc.subject
Piston
dc.subject
Stress
dc.subject
Ansys
dc.subject.classification
Mecánica Aplicada
dc.subject.classification
Ingeniería Mecánica
dc.subject.classification
INGENIERÍAS Y TECNOLOGÍAS
dc.title
Comparative Study and Evaluation of Two Different Finite Element Models for Piston Design
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2020-12-09T15:26:28Z
dc.journal.volume
9
dc.journal.pagination
23-37
dc.journal.pais
India
dc.description.fil
Fil: Adil, H.. Oxford Brookes University; Reino Unido
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gerguri, S.. Oxford Brookes University; Reino Unido
dc.description.fil
Fil: Durodola, J.. Oxford Brookes University; Reino Unido
dc.description.fil
Fil: Fellows, N.. Oxford Brookes University; Reino Unido
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bonatesta, F.. Oxford Brookes University; Reino Unido
dc.description.fil
Fil: Audebert, Fernando Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Tecnologías y Ciencias de la Ingeniería "Hilario Fernández Long". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Tecnologías y Ciencias de la Ingeniería "Hilario Fernández Long"; Argentina. Oxford Brookes University; Reino Unido
dc.journal.title
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/46999870-5757-4aa6-899a-06650461d349/1/
Archivos asociados