Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Richetta, Matías Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Gómez, Evangelina
dc.contributor.author
Lucero, María Soledad
dc.contributor.author
Chimeno Zoth, Silvina Andrea
dc.contributor.author
Gravisaco, María José
dc.contributor.author
Calamante, Gabriela
dc.contributor.author
Berinstein, Analía
dc.date.available
2020-11-03T20:50:03Z
dc.date.issued
2017-01
dc.identifier.citation
Richetta, Matías Daniel; Gómez, Evangelina; Lucero, María Soledad; Chimeno Zoth, Silvina Andrea; Gravisaco, María José; et al.; Comparison of homologous and heterologous prime-boost immunizations combining MVA-vectored and plant-derived VP2 as a strategy against IBDV; Elsevier; Vaccine; 35; 1; 1-2017; 142-148
dc.identifier.issn
0264-410X
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/117549
dc.description.abstract
Different immunogens such as subunit, DNA or live viral-vectored vaccines against Infectious Bursal Disease virus (IBDV) have been evaluated in the last years. However, the heterologous prime-boost approach using recombinant modified vaccinia Ankara virus (rMVA), which has shown promising results in both mammals and chickens, has not been tried against this pathogen yet. IBD is a highly contagious and immunosuppressive disease of poultry that affects mainly young chicks. It is caused by IBDV, a double-stranded RNA virus carrying its main antigenic epitopes on the capsid protein VP2. Our objective was to evaluate the immune response elicited by two heterologous prime-boost schemes combining an rMVA carrying the VP2 mature gene (rVP2) and a recombinant VP2 protein produced in Nicotiana benthamiana (pVP2), and to compare them with the performance of the homologous pVP2-pVP2 scheme usually used in our laboratory. The SPF chickens immunized with the three evaluated schemes elicited significantly higher anti-VP2 antibody titers (p < 0.001) and seroneutralizing titers (p < 0.05) and had less T-cell infiltration (p < 0.001), histological damage (p < 0.001) and IBDV particles (p < 0.001) in their bursae of Fabricius when compared with control groups. No significant differences were found between both heterologous schemes and the homologous one. However, the rVP2-pVP2 scheme showed significantly higher anti-VP2 antibody titers than pVP2-rVP2 and a similar tendency was found in the seroneutralization assay. Conversely, pVP2-rVP2 had the best performance when evaluated through bursal parameters despite having a less potent humoral immune response. These findings suggest that the order in which rVP2 and pVP2 are combined can influence the immune response obtained. Besides, the lack of a strong humoral immune response did not lessen the ability to protect from IBDV challenge. Therefore, further research is needed to evaluate the mechanisms by which these immunogens are working in order to define the combination that performs better against IBDV.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
AVIAN IMMUNE RESPONSE
dc.subject
IBDV
dc.subject
RECOMBINANT MVA
dc.subject
SUBUNIT VACCINE
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Veterinarias
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS
dc.title
Comparison of homologous and heterologous prime-boost immunizations combining MVA-vectored and plant-derived VP2 as a strategy against IBDV
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2020-11-02T17:03:57Z
dc.journal.volume
35
dc.journal.number
1
dc.journal.pagination
142-148
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam
dc.description.fil
Fil: Richetta, Matías Daniel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gómez, Evangelina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lucero, María Soledad. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Chimeno Zoth, Silvina Andrea. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gravisaco, María José. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Calamante, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Berinstein, Analía. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Vaccine
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.11.029
Archivos asociados