Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Mohtar Mohtar, Lina Goumana  
dc.contributor.author
Messina, Germán Alejandro  
dc.contributor.author
Bertolino, Franco Adrián  
dc.contributor.author
Pereira, Sirley Vanesa  
dc.contributor.author
Raba, Julio  
dc.contributor.author
Nazareno, Mónica Azucena  
dc.date.available
2020-10-29T14:17:48Z  
dc.date.issued
2020-11  
dc.identifier.citation
Mohtar Mohtar, Lina Goumana; Messina, Germán Alejandro; Bertolino, Franco Adrián; Pereira, Sirley Vanesa; Raba, Julio; et al.; Comparative study of different methodologies for the determination the antioxidant activity of Venezuelan propolis; Elsevier Science; Microchemical Journal; 158; 11-2020; 1-8  
dc.identifier.issn
0026-265X  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/117130  
dc.description.abstract
Propolis is a complex resinous substance produced by bees. Its physical and chemical composition vary according to the flora near the apiary and its geographical origin. Seven propolis samples, collected from different productive areas from Venezuela were selected to characterize their main antioxidant properties taking as reference well recognized samples from Argentina and Brazil. Total phenolic compound and flavonoid contents were determined by Folin-Ciocalteu and AlCl3 methods, respectively. The antiradical activity (ARA) was evaluated by bleaching techniques using both the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH[rad]) radical and 2,2-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical (ABTS[rad]+). Ferric ion reducing power (FRAP) and the antioxidant activity (AAO) by the β-carotene bleaching method induced by lipoxygenase were also determined. The electrochemical behavior of the ethanolic extracts was evaluated by cyclic voltammetry. The values obtained using the different methodologies showed variable results among different samples even being from the same provenance. Phenolic contents of Venezuelan propolis reached values in a wide range between 19.1 and 107 mg GAE/g. Flavonoid contents varied between 2.6 and 8.5 mg QE/g. Samples from Bolivar and Miranda did not differ statistically each other in their properties, although, can be distinguished from other provenances as Argentinean and Brazilian. Regarding to the electrochemical behavior, half of the samples showed two oxidation peaks. The remaining ones had correlation between the IC50 from O2[rad]− and DPPH[rad] scavenging assays. The highest correlations were found between FRAP and IC50 (O2[rad]−) (R = 0.70); IC50 (DPPH) (R = 0.89) and phenolic contents (R = 0.93). These results demonstrated that the cyclic voltammetry is a useful tool to remark differences among propolis according their antioxidant profile.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
ANTIOXIDANT  
dc.subject
PROPOLIS  
dc.subject
POLYPHENOLS  
dc.subject
CYCLIC VOLTAMMETRY  
dc.subject.classification
Química Analítica  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Químicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Comparative study of different methodologies for the determination the antioxidant activity of Venezuelan propolis  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2020-10-27T17:48:43Z  
dc.journal.volume
158  
dc.journal.pagination
1-8  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mohtar Mohtar, Lina Goumana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet Noa Sur. Centro de Investigación en Biofísica Aplicada y Alimentos. - Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Centro de Investigación en Biofísica Aplicada y Alimentos; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Messina, Germán Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Química de San Luis. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia. Instituto de Química de San Luis; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bertolino, Franco Adrián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Química de San Luis. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia. Instituto de Química de San Luis; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pereira, Sirley Vanesa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Química de San Luis. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia. Instituto de Química de San Luis; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Raba, Julio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Química de San Luis. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia. Instituto de Química de San Luis; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Nazareno, Mónica Azucena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Microchemical Journal  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0026265X20315034  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.105244