Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Delvenne, Pierre
dc.contributor.author
Kreimer, Pablo Rafael
dc.contributor.other
Tyfield, David
dc.contributor.other
Lave, Rebecca
dc.contributor.other
Randalls, Samuel
dc.contributor.other
Thorpe, Charles
dc.date.available
2020-10-13T15:56:42Z
dc.date.issued
2017
dc.identifier.citation
Delvenne, Pierre; Kreimer, Pablo Rafael; World-System Analysis 2.0: Globalized Science in Centers and Peripheries; Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd; 2017; 390-404
dc.identifier.isbn
9780367581275
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/115791
dc.description.abstract
Science is being transformed by a series of technical and organizational changes that profoundly affect the terms of its production and use, thereby reconfiguring its role in contemporary societies. At the national level, these changes have particularly been analyzed in terms of modes (Nowotny et al., 2001), of ?regimes of knowledge production (Pestre, 2003; Van Oudheusden et al., 2015), of reconfiguration of the relationship between state, science and industry (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff, 2000; Joerges and Shinn, 2001), of shifting governance and research evaluation (Mustar and Laredo, 2002), or of a renewed relationship between science and society, due to the increase in public controversies involving scientific and technical issues (Latour, 1999).Furthermore, the nature of the production of scientific knowledge is also subject to greateropenness, for example to indigenous knowledge, patient associations (Callon and Rabeharisoa, 2003) or other kind of actors (Jasanoff, 2004, Collins and Evans, 2008).At the international level, even if science always was an international enterprise (Salomon,2006) during recent decades it has become increasingly globalized and the reorganization of international science presents a growing complex map. Indeed, some authors (Rosemann,2014; Moya-Anegón et al., 2013; Grauwin et al., 2012; Veugelers, 2010) talk about a newmultipolarity, particularly pointing at the decline of the formerly leading nations in the shareof international scientific production (especially the US and Western Europe), and theemergence of new regions, like BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India, China). However, there existuntil today very few studies focused on the consequences of these changes on less advanced(semi-peripheral) countries and on the relationships among knowledge production centers,with a critical perspective that takes into account the emerging complex dynamics. Therefore, our aim in this chapter is to suggest an analytical framework and to present empirical data on these dynamics, as well as on the consequences that globalization has on the international organization of science, analyzing the complex relations between centers and peripheries (emphasizing the plural).
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Globalization
dc.subject
Science
dc.subject
Centers and peripheries
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencia Política
dc.subject.classification
Ciencia Política
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES
dc.title
World-System Analysis 2.0: Globalized Science in Centers and Peripheries
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro
dc.date.updated
2020-10-09T15:58:13Z
dc.journal.pagination
390-404
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
dc.description.fil
Fil: Delvenne, Pierre. No especifíca;
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kreimer, Pablo Rafael. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Handbook-of-the-Political-Economy-of-Science/Tyfield-Lave-Randalls-Thorpe/p/book/9780367581275
dc.conicet.paginas
472
dc.source.titulo
Routledge Handbook of Political Economy of Science
Archivos asociados