Repositorio Institucional
Repositorio Institucional
CONICET Digital
  • Inicio
  • EXPLORAR
    • AUTORES
    • DISCIPLINAS
    • COMUNIDADES
  • Estadísticas
  • Novedades
    • Noticias
    • Boletines
  • Ayuda
    • General
    • Datos de investigación
  • Acerca de
    • CONICET Digital
    • Equipo
    • Red Federal
  • Contacto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
  • INFORMACIÓN GENERAL
  • RESUMEN
  • ESTADISTICAS
 
Artículo

Post-fire resprouting capacity of seasonally dry forest species - Two quantitative indices

Jaureguiberry, PedroIcon ; Cuchietti, AnibalIcon ; Gorne, Lucas DamiánIcon ; Bertone, Gustavo; Díaz, Sandra MyrnaIcon
Fecha de publicación: 06/2020
Editorial: Elsevier Science
Revista: Forest Ecology and Management
ISSN: 0378-1127
Idioma: Inglés
Tipo de recurso: Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Ecología

Resumen

Qualitative measures of resprouting capacity often fail to capture inter- and intra-species variation, whereasavailable quantitative methods can be complex and time-consuming, hindering broad-scale comparative studies. Here, we propose two quantitative indices that can be applied in a standard way in different regions. We sampled1046 plants of 20 dominant species (6 shrubs, 7 trees and 7 tree/shrubs) from the seasonally dry forests of thearid Chaco, central-western Argentina. Sampling was conducted in burned field sites one growing season afterfire. For each sampled plant we measured the diameter of the main burned trunk (MTD) and main resprout(MRD), and the number of burned trunks (TN) and resprouts (RN); we then built estimated composite diametersfor trunks and resprouts (ECTD and ECRD) and we calculated two alternative Resprouting Capacity Indices: RCI1 (ECRD/ECTD); and RCI 2 (MRD/MTD). The indices were validated against a measure of Resprouting Vigour(RV) that included detailed measurement of all trunks and resprouts for a subset of sampled plants. In all cases,variables indicative of fire severity were measured and included in the analyses. The RCIs and RV were highlyrelated, both at the species and growth form levels. Fire severity had no significant effect on these relationships,but growth form affected RCI 2. All species were capable of resprouting, showing considerable inter-speciesvariation for the two proposed RCIs. Species rank differed considerably between RCIs and survival-only estimations.RCI 1 was higher in tree/shrubs (i.e. species regarded as trees or shrubs) and trees than in shrubs. Allspecies showed decreasing resprouting capacity with increasing ECTD. Our results support the use of the proposedRCIs as a robust tool to assess resprouting capacity, providing more details than survival-based assessments.Choosing one or the other implies a trade-off between accuracy and simplicity, and may depend on thescale and objective of the study, and resprouting patterns of studied species. Species, growth form and individualplant size are relevant in explaining post-fire resprouting capacity and survival.
Palabras clave: CENTRAL ARGENTINA , CHACO REGION , FIRE ECOLOGY , PLANT ALLOMETRIC RELATIONSHIPS , PLANT FUNCTIONAL TRAITS , POST-FIRE RESPROUTING , POST-FIRE REGENERATION , SEASONALLY DRY FOREST , RESPROUTING CAPACITY INDEX , RESPROUTING VIGOUR
Ver el registro completo
 
Archivos asociados
Tamaño: 1.485Mb
Formato: PDF
.
Solicitar
Licencia
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/115011
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112720310367?dgcid=author
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118267
Colecciones
Articulos(IMBIV)
Articulos de INST.MULTIDISCIPL.DE BIOLOGIA VEGETAL (P)
Citación
Jaureguiberry, Pedro; Cuchietti, Anibal; Gorne, Lucas Damián; Bertone, Gustavo; Díaz, Sandra Myrna; Post-fire resprouting capacity of seasonally dry forest species - Two quantitative indices; Elsevier Science; Forest Ecology and Management; 473; 6-2020
Compartir
Altmétricas
 

Enviar por e-mail
Separar cada destinatario (hasta 5) con punto y coma.
  • Facebook
  • X Conicet Digital
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Sound Cloud
  • LinkedIn

Los contenidos del CONICET están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License

https://www.conicet.gov.ar/ - CONICET

Inicio

Explorar

  • Autores
  • Disciplinas
  • Comunidades

Estadísticas

Novedades

  • Noticias
  • Boletines

Ayuda

Acerca de

  • CONICET Digital
  • Equipo
  • Red Federal

Contacto

Godoy Cruz 2290 (C1425FQB) CABA – República Argentina – Tel: +5411 4899-5400 repositorio@conicet.gov.ar
TÉRMINOS Y CONDICIONES