Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Bustos Cara, Roberto Nicolas  
dc.contributor.author
Pinassi, Andrés  
dc.contributor.other
Manero Miguel, Fernando  
dc.contributor.other
García Cuesta, José Luí  
dc.date.available
2020-09-21T21:38:07Z  
dc.date.issued
2017  
dc.identifier.citation
Bustos Cara, Roberto Nicolas; Pinassi, Andrés; The development and management of territorial heritage: The recent experience of Argentina; Thomson Reuters Aranzadi; 2017; 277-298  
dc.identifier.isbn
978-84-9152-762-6  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/114494  
dc.description.abstract
«Identity, culture, heritage and territory are convergent concepts in the sense that their essential constitutive attributes make up the network of meanings that sustain the world of objects and actions […]. This convergence should be interpreted in two complementary ways, oriented towards both the past and the future, acting as static references, or as the driving force of a dynamic that assumes the form of an interested transfer or an ever-renewing creation» (Bustos Cara, 2004: 17). As Guy Di Meo said, heritage values are defined like the territory, as «time which makes sense and has meaning as if it were history crystallised into an object, place or event. It has two natures, the material and the ideal. It has a mnemonic function. They insert the social fabric into a historical continuity made up of solid cultural references that generate ideological and political control». «How can we understand territory without assigning a heritage value to it?». «Neither territory nor heritage represent an a priori fact. Yet every object may have a heritage function and every space may be transformed into a territory, if one or the other is integrated in a communicational context» (Di Meo, 1998: 59). The idea of heritage covers a broad and extremely dynamic conceptual field, and this is why it is difficult to establish an institutional management structure that can moderate between conflicts and may keep its dynamic character in check. In this sense, there is a close relation between heritage and territory and between heritage and development, and this relation is always variable in content, depending on the ideological, political, economic or cultural context from which it is analysed. In times of the construction or reconstruction of nation states, or at times when there is a dominantly liberal or neoliberal vision within the globalisation framework, then the processes that lead to heritage status and its institutionalisation have acquired different characteristics and scales.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Thomson Reuters Aranzadi  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
TERRITORY  
dc.subject
TERRITORIAL HERITAGE  
dc.subject
DEVELOPMENT  
dc.subject
ARGENTINA  
dc.subject.classification
Geografía Cultural y Económica  
dc.subject.classification
Geografía Económica y Social  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES  
dc.title
The development and management of territorial heritage: The recent experience of Argentina  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro  
dc.date.updated
2020-07-27T14:06:43Z  
dc.journal.pagination
277-298  
dc.journal.pais
España  
dc.journal.ciudad
Navarra  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bustos Cara, Roberto Nicolas. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Geografía y Turismo; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pinassi, Andrés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Geografía y Turismo; Argentina  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/36890  
dc.conicet.paginas
327  
dc.source.titulo
Territorial heritage and spatial planning: A geographical perspective