Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Soares, Lucas  
dc.contributor.other
Cornelli, Gabriele  
dc.date.available
2020-09-02T18:14:50Z  
dc.date.issued
2016  
dc.identifier.citation
Soares, Lucas; Perspectivism, Proleptic Writing and Generic agón: Three Readings of the Symposium; De Gruyter; 2016; 63-75  
dc.identifier.isbn
978-3-11-044403-2  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/113072  
dc.description.abstract
Traditional readings of the Symposium generally reduce Platonic erotics to the Socrates-Diotima discourse, relegating the five prior discourses and the last by Alcibiades to a secondary philosophical role. The devaluation of these discourses runs parallel to the canonization of the Socrates-Diotima discourse as a privileged place through which Plato supposedly reveals his only and true thought as to the nature of love. This primacy given to the Socratic eulogy tends to be supported by the key distinction that Socrates establishes as a criterion, in standing as a guarantor of the truth in relation to the erotic issue before pronouncing his discourse. With this traditional reading of the dialogue in mind, in the present work I am interested in proposing a reading of the Symposium based on three mutually-correlative philosophical-literary currents. As regards the first current, and against the backdrop of dramatic-philosophical polyphony that characterizes the dialogue, I start from the assumption that the erotic issue, as Plato presents it in the Symposium, cannot be grasped unidirectionally, but through seven theoretical perspectives in harmony. The second current is concerned with analyzing the extent to which Plato puts into practice in the Symposium, as in no other dialogue, a kind of proleptic writing, in the sense that each eulogy contains fragmentary foretastes of topics that, through a subtle play of rectification and complementation, will be taken up again in later discourses. This proleptic writing is related to the perspectivist reading, as each discursive position is constituted from its dialogical-philosophical counterpoint with the remaining theoretical perspectives. As for the third current, I am interested in taking the agonal character typical of the Greek mentality in this period, approaching dialogue in the light of an agón between discursive genres, an aspect related to this play of counterpoints that the discourses establish between them.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
De Gruyter  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
BANQUETE  
dc.subject
PERSPECTIVISMO  
dc.subject
AGÓN  
dc.subject
DISCURSO  
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia y la Tecnología  
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Ética y Religión  
dc.subject.classification
HUMANIDADES  
dc.title
Perspectivism, Proleptic Writing and Generic agón: Three Readings of the Symposium  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro  
dc.date.updated
2020-08-28T18:44:46Z  
dc.journal.pagination
63-75  
dc.journal.pais
Alemania  
dc.journal.ciudad
Berlin  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Soares, Lucas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.degruyter.com/view/title/514386  
dc.conicet.paginas
420  
dc.source.titulo
Plato´s Styles and Characters: between Literature and Philosophy