Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel  
dc.contributor.author
Brussino, Silvina Alejandra  
dc.date.available
2020-09-02T14:47:43Z  
dc.date.issued
2013-12  
dc.identifier.citation
Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel; Brussino, Silvina Alejandra; Psychological perspectives in the study of authoritarianism; International Academy of Social Sciences; Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences; 5; 3; 12-2013; 495-521  
dc.identifier.issn
1944-1088  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/113018  
dc.description.abstract
Different theoretical perspectives have been developed within the psychology framework for the analysis of the authoritarian phenomenon. They constituted some of the background lines of what would after wards be considered as the field of Political Psychology. The first approach takes place in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century`s, along with group psychology, where authoritarianism is studied as an emergent behavior of crowds. Subsequently, developments inauthoritarian personality suggest a change in the analysis axes by studying the phenomenon in an intra-individual way. A third perspective arises with the cognitive approach, represented by the concept of dogmatism, which emphasized the study of beliefs and the way in which individuals defend them. Parallel to this approach, advances in the field of Experimental Psychology on obedience, account for the situation in the authoritarian phenomenon. Later on, the study of authoritarian personality is taken up once more with the concept of right-wing authoritarianism, which is defined as the individual differences in the covariation of three attitudinal clusters (authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression and conventionalism). Finally, the most recent perspective for the study of the phenomenon suggests rethinking rightwing authoritarianism as an intergroup phenomenon, since its three attitudinal clusters account for a group phenomenon, plus a personality trait. The main objective of this paper is to critically review each of the six perspectives which have approached the study of authoritarianism as psycho-political phenomena, showing its peculiarities as well as its differences so as to finally consider which of those are still acceptable alternatives for the interpretation of this phenomenon.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
International Academy of Social Sciences  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
AUTHORITARIANISM  
dc.subject
CROWDS  
dc.subject
DOGMATISM  
dc.subject
OBEDIENCE  
dc.subject
SUBMISSION  
dc.subject
AGRESSION  
dc.subject
CONVENTIONALISM  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Psicología  
dc.subject.classification
Psicología  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES  
dc.title
Psychological perspectives in the study of authoritarianism  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2019-10-23T14:48:04Z  
dc.identifier.eissn
1944-1096  
dc.journal.volume
5  
dc.journal.number
3  
dc.journal.pagination
495-521  
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Florida  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Brussino, Silvina Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.japss.org/Japss-Dec13.html  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.japss.org/upload/3.%20Etchezahar%20&%20Brussino.pdf