Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
García, Alejandro Javier
dc.contributor.author
Prakken, Henry
dc.contributor.author
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
dc.date.available
2020-03-19T20:52:22Z
dc.date.issued
2019-10
dc.identifier.citation
García, Alejandro Javier; Prakken, Henry; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC+ and DeLP; Cambridge University Press; Theory And Practice Of Logic Programming; 10-2019; 1-33
dc.identifier.issn
1471-0684
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/100369
dc.description.abstract
This paper formally compares some central notions from two well-known formalisms for rule-based argumentation, DeLP and ASPIC+. The comparisons especially focus on intuitive adequacy and inter-translatability, consistency, and closure properties. As for differences in the definitions of arguments and attack, it turns out that DeLP's definitions are intuitively appealing but that they may not fully comply with Caminada and Amgoud's rationality postulates of strict closure and indirect consistency. For some special cases, the DeLP definitions are shown to fare better than ASPIC+. Next, it is argued that there are reasons to consider a variant of DeLP with grounded semantics, since in some examples its current notion of warrant arguably has counterintuitive consequences and may lead to sets of warranted arguments that are not admissible. Finally, under some minimality and consistency assumptions on ASPIC+ arguments, a one-to-many correspondence between ASPIC+ arguments and DeLP arguments is identified in such a way that if the DeLP warranting procedure is changed to grounded semantics, then 's DeLP notion of warrant and ASPIC+ 's notion of justification are equivalent. This result is proven for three alternative definitions of attack.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Cambridge University Press
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
ASPIC+
dc.subject
DEFEASIBLE LOGIC PROGRAMMING
dc.subject
RULE-BASED ARGUMENTATION
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Computación
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Computación e Información
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS
dc.title
A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC+ and DeLP
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2020-02-26T19:32:59Z
dc.identifier.eissn
1475-3081
dc.journal.pagination
1-33
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
dc.journal.ciudad
Cambridge
dc.description.fil
Fil: García, Alejandro Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Prakken, Henry. University of Groningen; Países Bajos. Utrecht University; Países Bajos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Theory And Practice Of Logic Programming
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1471068419000437
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/theory-and-practice-of-logic-programming/article/comparative-study-of-some-central-notions-of-aspic-and-delp/E6270F981ECA133011FD3D0A175F2C54
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.02810
Archivos asociados