Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Machuca, Diego Emanuel
dc.date.available
2018-04-13T21:30:44Z
dc.date.issued
2015-04
dc.identifier.citation
Machuca, Diego Emanuel; Conciliationism and the Menace of Scepticism; Cambridge University Press; Dialogue-Canadian Philosophical Review; 54; 3; 4-2015; 469-488
dc.identifier.issn
0012-2173
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42059
dc.description.abstract
It is sometimes claimed that conciliatory views on disagreement ultimately lead to either global or widespread scepticism. This is deemed to be a real problem for conciliationism either because scepticism of either kind is patently untenable or because it poses a serious threat to our intellectual and social lives. In this paper, I first argue that the alleged untenability of both types of scepticism is far from obvious and should therefore be established rather than taken for granted. Then, I show that those who reject both types of scepticism because of the threat they pose surprisingly confuse pragmatic reasons with epistemic reasons.
dc.description.abstract
On dit parfois que les positions conciliationistes sur le désaccord aboutissent à un scepticisme soit global soit étendu. Ceci est considéré comme un réel problème pour le conciliationisme, soit parce que ces deux types de scepticisme sont manifestement insoutenables, soit parce qu’ils constituent une menace sérieuse pour nos vies intellectuelle et sociale. Dans cet article, je montre d’abord que le caractère prétendument insoutenable de ces deux types de scepticisme est loin d’être évident et devrait donc être démontré au lieu d’être simplement présupposé. Je montre ensuite que ceux qui rejettent ces deux types de scepticisme à cause de la menace qu’ils représentent confondent de manière étonnante raisons pragmatiques et raisons épistémiques.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Cambridge University Press
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Conciliationism
dc.subject
Disagreement
dc.subject
Skepticism
dc.subject
Epistemic Reasons
dc.subject.classification
Estudios Religiosos
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Ética y Religión
dc.subject.classification
HUMANIDADES
dc.title
Conciliationism and the Menace of Scepticism
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2018-04-12T14:29:01Z
dc.journal.volume
54
dc.journal.number
3
dc.journal.pagination
469-488
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
dc.journal.ciudad
Cambridge
dc.description.fil
Fil: Machuca, Diego Emanuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Dialogue-Canadian Philosophical Review
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0012217315000347
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie/article/conciliationism-and-the-menace-of-scepticism/3D7FB244100A1A008FFE0A7DC3F50C7F
Archivos asociados