Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Tusman, Gerardo  
dc.contributor.author
Groisman, Ivan  
dc.contributor.author
Maidana, Gustavo A.  
dc.contributor.author
Scandurra, Adriana G.  
dc.contributor.author
Martinez Arca, Jorge  
dc.contributor.author
Bohm, Stephan H.  
dc.contributor.author
Suarez-Sipmann, Fernando  
dc.date.available
2018-01-15T14:56:30Z  
dc.date.issued
2016-05-01  
dc.identifier.citation
Tusman, Gerardo; Scandurra, Adriana G.; Maidana, Gustavo A.; Martinez Arca, Jorge; Suarez-Sipmann, Fernando; Groisman, Ivan; et al.; The sensitivity and specificity of pulmonary carbon dioxide elimination for noninvasive assessment of fluid responsiveness; Lippincott Williams; Anesthesia And Analgesia; 122; 5; 1-5-2016; 1404-1411  
dc.identifier.issn
0003-2999  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/33214  
dc.description.abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether the response of pulmonary elimination of CO2 (Vco2) to a sudden increase in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) could predict fluid responsiveness and serve as a noninvasive surrogate for cardiac index (CI).METHODS: Fifty-two patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery were included in this study. By using a constant-flow ventilation mode, we performed a PEEP challenge of 1-minute increase in PEEP from 5 to 10 cm H2O. At PEEP of 5 cm H2O, patients were preloaded with 500 mL IV salinesolution after which a second PEEP challenge was performed. Patients in whom fluid administration increased CI by ≥15% from the individual baseline value were defined as volume responders.Beat-by-beat CI was derived from arterial pulse contour analysis, and breath-by-breath Vco2 data were collected during the protocol. The sensitivity and specificity of Vco2 for detecting thefluid responders according to CI was performed by the receiver operating Characteristic curves.RESULTS: Twenty-one of 52 patients were identified as fluid responders (40%). The PEEP maneuver before fluid administration decreased CI from 2.65 ± 0.34 to 2.21 ± 0.32 L/min/m2 (P = 0.0011) and Vco2 from 150 ± 23 to 123 ± 23 mL/min (P = 0.0036) in responders, whereas the changes in CI and Vco2 were not significant in nonresponders. The PEEP challenge afterfluid administration induced no significant changes in CI and Vco2, in neither responders nor nonresponders. PEEP-induced decreases in CI and Vco2 before fluid administration were well correlated (r2 = 0.75, P < 0.0001) but not thereafter. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for a PEEP-induced decrease in ΔCI and ΔVco2 was 0.99, with a 95% confidence interval from 0.96 to 0.99 for ΔCI and from 0.97 to 0.99 for ΔVco2. During the PEEP challenge,a decrease in Vco2 by 11% predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.87?0.93) and a specificity of 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.92?0.98).CONCLUSIONS: PEEP-induced changes in Vco2 predicted fluid responsiveness with accuracy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. (Anesth Analg 2016;122:1404?11)  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Lippincott Williams  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 AR)  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Sensitivity And Specificity  
dc.subject
Carbon Dioxide Elimination  
dc.subject
Fluid Responsiveness  
dc.subject
Cardiac Index  
dc.subject.classification
Medicina Critica y de Emergencia  
dc.subject.classification
Medicina Clínica  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Y DE LA SALUD  
dc.title
The sensitivity and specificity of pulmonary carbon dioxide elimination for noninvasive assessment of fluid responsiveness  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2018-01-12T19:24:37Z  
dc.journal.volume
122  
dc.journal.number
5  
dc.journal.pagination
1404-1411  
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Philadelphia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Tusman, Gerardo. Fundación Medica de Mar del Plata. Hospital Privado de Comunidad; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Groisman, Ivan. Fundación Medica de Mar del Plata. Hospital Privado de Comunidad; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Maidana, Gustavo A.. Fundación Medica de Mar del Plata. Hospital Privado de Comunidad; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Scandurra, Adriana G.. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Departamento de Electronica; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Martinez Arca, Jorge. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Departamento de Electronica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bohm, Stephan H.. University Hospital; Suecia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Suarez-Sipmann, Fernando. Instituto de Salud Carlos III; España  
dc.journal.title
Anesthesia And Analgesia  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://insights.ovid.com/pubmed?pmid=26505574  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001047