Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Laoretani, Daniela Soledad  
dc.contributor.author
Fischer, Carlos Daniel  
dc.date.available
2024-04-10T12:40:47Z  
dc.date.issued
2023-10  
dc.identifier.citation
Laoretani, Daniela Soledad; Fischer, Carlos Daniel; Alternative Process Design for Pesticide Reduction in an Edible Oil Industry Byproduct (Oil Deodorization Distillate); American Chemical Society; ACS Food Science and Technology; 3; 10; 10-2023; 1719-1727  
dc.identifier.issn
2692-1944  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/232595  
dc.description.abstract
Current food trends emphasize natural, nutraceutical-rich foods that are free of chemical contaminants. The goal of this study is to reduce the presence of pesticides in an oil deodorization distillate, an economical raw material rich in natural antioxidants, such as tocopherols and phytosterols. However, as a byproduct of the edible oil refining industry, it contains pesticides, which are undesirable in the final product. In this study, two common technologies employed in the edible oil industry, namely,steam-distillation and steam stripping, are analyzed for their effectiveness in separating endosulfal (pesticide) from antioxidants. An industry standard oil deodorization distillate stream with a flow rate of 40 kg/h containing 39.6 wt % of tocopherols, 52.6 wt % of free fatty acids, and 7.8 wt % of pesticide is considered, and the process variables such as temperature, steam flow, and number of separation stages are examined. These results show that both technologies reach the final product concentration to the maximum residue limits for the final product. The stripping technology has better economic and productivity performance. With this technology, the net annual income (NAI) reached was 2.5 million US$/y, while the optimum process variables were a temperature of 190 °C for feed products, 4.9 kg/h of feed steam, and 8 stages of separations. The performance was about 30% larger than that for the deodorizer. This study is highly attractive to edible oil industries looking to add value to their byproducts with minimal inversion cost. Otherwise, byproducts would have to be treated as high organic load and oxygen-demanding wastes.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
American Chemical Society  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
PESTICIDES  
dc.subject
ENDOSULFAN  
dc.subject
OIL DEODORIZATION DISTILLATE  
dc.subject
DEODORIZATION OF BYPRODUCT  
dc.subject
STRIPPING  
dc.subject
PROCESS DESIGN  
dc.subject
NATURAL THOCOPEROLS  
dc.subject
ANTIOXIDANTS  
dc.subject.classification
Ingeniería de Procesos Químicos  
dc.subject.classification
Ingeniería Química  
dc.subject.classification
INGENIERÍAS Y TECNOLOGÍAS  
dc.title
Alternative Process Design for Pesticide Reduction in an Edible Oil Industry Byproduct (Oil Deodorization Distillate)  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2024-04-10T12:16:13Z  
dc.journal.volume
3  
dc.journal.number
10  
dc.journal.pagination
1719-1727  
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Laoretani, Daniela Soledad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Fischer, Carlos Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
ACS Food Science and Technology  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.3c00261  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.3c00261