A two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking: Joint and (various) collective forms of intentionality

Abstract

Social accounts of objective content, like the one advanced by Tomasello (2014), are traditionally challenged by an 'essential tension' (Hutto and Satne 2015). The tension is the following: While sociality is deemed to be at the basis of thinking, in order to explain sociality, some form of thinking seems to be necessarily presupposed. In this contribution I analyse Tomasello's two-step theory of the evolution of human thinking vis-à-vis this challenge. While his theory is in principle suited to address it, I claim that the specifics of the first step and the notion of perspective that infuse it are problematic in this regard. I end by briefly sketching an alternative.