Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Soria, María Cecilia
dc.contributor.author
Soria, Mario Alberto
dc.contributor.author
Bueno, Dante Javier
dc.contributor.author
Terzolo, Horacio Raúl
dc.date.available
2019-10-04T18:27:10Z
dc.date.issued
2013-06
dc.identifier.citation
Soria, María Cecilia; Soria, Mario Alberto; Bueno, Dante Javier; Terzolo, Horacio Raúl; Comparison of 3 culture methods and PCR assays for Salmonella gallinarum and Salmonella pullorum detection in poultry feed; Poultry Science Association; Poultry Science; 92; 6; 6-2013; 1505-1515
dc.identifier.issn
0032-5791
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/85256
dc.description.abstract
To detect Salmonella gallinarum or Salmonella pullorum in artificially contaminated poultry feed, 9 culture combinations were compared, including 3 preenrichment/enrichment methods (tryptic soy broth plus ferrous sulfate/tetrathionate Hajna, tryptic soy broth plus ferrous sulfate/selenite cystine broth, and Salmosyst) in combination with 3 selective agars (xylose lysine desoxicholate agar added with tergitol 4, EF-18, and Önöz), respectively. Additionally, a single PCR technique was applied combined with 2 different preenrichment media (tryptic soy broth plus ferrous sulfate and Salmosyst). The specificity and positive predictive value were 1 for all methods. There were some differences among Salmonella strains for sensitivity and accuracy in the culture and Salmosyst-PCR methods. The sensitivity and accuracy values were less than 0.60 and 0.64, respectively, whereas the negative predictive values were between 0.12 and 0.23. Two PCR methods did not show any difference in the parameters of performance evaluated. Kappa coefficients showed good agreement between both methods. None of the culture combinations was able to detect S. gallinarum or S. pullorum when the inoculum was less than 3 × 102 cfu/25 g, except the Salmosyst broth method, which could recover S. gallinarum from 3 × 101 cfu/25 g onward. Overall, there were differences in the detection limits among the strains and methods used. In general, the 3 selective plating media did not show any significant difference in the parameters of performance studied for each strain. On the other hand, the agreements were slight to fair when culture methods were compared among them and with both PCR methods. The differences in the detection levels that were obtained using these methods and the difficulty in detecting S. gallinarum or S. pullorum in feed represent a potential problem when a poultry feed sample is considered to be negative. It is highly recommended to use at least 2 methods to increase the chances of detecting S. gallinarum or S. pullorum in poultry feed.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Poultry Science Association
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
CULTURE METHOD
dc.subject
PCR
dc.subject
POULTRY FEED
dc.subject
SALMONELLA GALLINARUM
dc.subject
SALMONELLA PULLORUM
dc.subject.classification
Biología Celular, Microbiología
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS
dc.title
Comparison of 3 culture methods and PCR assays for Salmonella gallinarum and Salmonella pullorum detection in poultry feed
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2019-06-10T20:34:55Z
dc.journal.volume
92
dc.journal.number
6
dc.journal.pagination
1505-1515
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Soria, María Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Ríos. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Soria, Mario Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Ríos. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bueno, Dante Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Ríos. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Terzolo, Horacio Raúl. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Poultry Science
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02926
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/ps/article/92/6/1505/1592721/
Archivos asociados