Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Robert, Veronica
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.contributor.author
Yoguel, Gabriel Leopoldo
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.contributor.author
Lerena, Octavio
dc.date.available
2019-03-20T17:47:23Z
dc.date.issued
2017-09
dc.identifier.citation
Robert, Veronica; Yoguel, Gabriel Leopoldo; Lerena, Octavio; The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change; Springer; Journal Of Evolutionary Economics; 27; 4; 9-2017; 761-793
dc.identifier.issn
0936-9937
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/72099
dc.description.abstract
Different studies have tried to find a common thread that places different evolutionary and neo-Schumpeterian contributions to economic change under one umbrella. The complexity approach can account for a set of attributes that evolutionary economics has been considering, as decentralized interaction, heterogeneous agents, bounded rationality, networks of linkages, non-linear dynamics, divergent paths, disequilibrium and emergent properties. In this regard, the complexity approach could be a theoretical and conceptual starting point that allows the integration of different contributions (Davis, 2008; Fontana, 2013). In this article, we attempt to show that complexity can also be useful to point out the profound differences between evolutionary strands. This paper analyzes how the ontological evolutionary assumptions of complexity are emphasized with different intensity by different groups of representative contributions of evolutionary economics. We propose that these differences reflect deeper issues related to two major concerns of economic theory: coordination and order vs. transformation and change of economic systems (Dosi and Orsenigo 1988). In this context, the hypothesis of the article is that complexity acts as an umbrella and at the same time as a differentiating criterion of different strands within evolutionary economics, since their ontological assumptions relate differentially to these two concerns. Using a bibliometric methodology, we identify a set of representative contributions for five strands of evolutionary economics. Additionally, we analyze how the various dimensions and attributes of complexity ontology are emphasized unevenly by each group of contributions. To show the differences, we quote fragments from contributions corresponding to the dimensions and attributes of the complexity and use a set of nonparametric tests to corroborate the significance of the differences in the frequency in which these references appear. The results show that, while groups concerned with coordination are focused on heterogeneity and networks assumptions, groups concerned with transformation stress path dependence and divergent dynamics. Emergent properties are common to all of them.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Springer
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Complexity
dc.subject
Coordination
dc.subject
Economic Change
dc.subject
Evolutionary Theory
dc.subject
Neo-Schumpeterian
dc.subject.classification
Economía, Econometría
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
Economía y Negocios
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.title
The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2019-03-20T13:26:18Z
dc.journal.volume
27
dc.journal.number
4
dc.journal.pagination
761-793
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.journal.ciudad
Nueva York
dc.description.fil
Fil: Robert, Veronica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Altos Estudios Sociales; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Yoguel, Gabriel Leopoldo. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Industria; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lerena, Octavio. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Industria; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Journal Of Evolutionary Economics
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00191-017-0512-x
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00191-017-0512-x
Archivos asociados