Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Soria, María Cecilia  
dc.contributor.author
Soria, María A.  
dc.contributor.author
Bueno, Dante Javier  
dc.contributor.author
Godano, E. I.  
dc.contributor.author
Gómez, S.C.  
dc.contributor.author
ViaButron, I. A.  
dc.contributor.author
Padin, V. M.  
dc.contributor.author
Rogé, A. D.  
dc.date.available
2018-11-05T14:27:46Z  
dc.date.issued
2017-08-31  
dc.identifier.citation
Soria, María Cecilia; Soria, María A.; Bueno, Dante Javier; Godano, E. I.; Gómez, S.C.; et al.; Salmonella spp. contamination in commercial layer hen farms using different types of samples and detection methods; Poultry Science Association; Poultry Science; 96; 8; 31-8-2017; 2820-2830  
dc.identifier.issn
0032-5791  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/63598  
dc.description.abstract
The performance of detection methods (culture methods and polymerase chain reaction assay) and plating media used in the same type of samples were determined as well as the specificity of PCR primers to detected Salmonella spp. contamination in layer hen farms. Also, the association of farm characteristics with Salmonella presence was evaluated. Environmental samples (feces, feed, drinking water, air, bootswabs) and eggs were taken from 40 layer hen houses. Salmonella spp. was most detected in boot-swabs taken around the houses (30% and 35% by isolation and PCR, respectively) follow by fecal samples (15.2% and 13.6% by isolation and PCR, respectively). Eggs, drinking water, and air samples were negative for Salmonella detection. Salmonella Schwarzengrund and S. Enteritidis were the most isolated serotypes. For plating media, relative specificity was 1, and the relative sensitivity was greater for EF-18 agar than XLDT agar in feed and fecal samples. However, relative sensitivity was greater in XLDT agar than EF-18 agar for boot-swab samples. Agreement was between fair to good depending on the sample, and it was good between isolation and PCR (feces and boot-swabs), without agreement for feed samples. Salmonella spp. PCR was positive for all strains, while S. Typhimurium PCR was negative. Salmonella Enteritidis PCR used was not specific. Based in the multiple logistic regression analyses, categorization by counties was significant for Salmonella spp. presence (P-value = 0.010). This study shows the importance of considering different types of samples, plating media and detection methods during a Salmonella spp. monitoring study. In addition, it is important to incorporate the sampling of floors around the layer hen houses to learn if biosecurity measures should be strengthened to minimize the entry and spread of Salmonella in the houses. Also, the performance of some PCR methods and S. Enteritidis PCR should be improved, and biosecurity measures in hen farms must be reinforced in the region of more concentrated layer hen houses to reduce the probability of Salmonella spp. presence.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Poultry Science Association  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Detection  
dc.subject
Layer Hen Farm  
dc.subject
Salmonella  
dc.subject
Sampling  
dc.subject.classification
Salud Ocupacional  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Salud  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Y DE LA SALUD  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Salmonella spp. contamination in commercial layer hen farms using different types of samples and detection methods  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2018-10-23T17:29:11Z  
dc.journal.volume
96  
dc.journal.number
8  
dc.journal.pagination
2820-2830  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Oxford  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Soria, María Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Rios; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Soria, María A.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Rios; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bueno, Dante Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Rios; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Godano, E. I.. Tecnovo S.A.; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gómez, S.C.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Rios; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: ViaButron, I. A.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Rios; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Padin, V. M.. Dirección Nacional de Instituto de Investigación. Administración Nacional de Laboratorio e Instituto de Salud “Dr. C. G. Malbrán”; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rogé, A. D.. Dirección Nacional de Instituto de Investigación. Administración Nacional de Laboratorio e Instituto de Salud “Dr. C. G. Malbrán”; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Poultry Science  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex053  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/ps/article/96/8/2820/3096894