Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Soria, María Cecilia

dc.contributor.author
Soria, María A.
dc.contributor.author
Bueno, Dante Javier

dc.contributor.author
Godano, E. I.
dc.contributor.author
Gómez, S.C.
dc.contributor.author
ViaButron, I. A.
dc.contributor.author
Padin, V. M.
dc.contributor.author
Rogé, A. D.
dc.date.available
2018-11-05T14:27:46Z
dc.date.issued
2017-08-31
dc.identifier.citation
Soria, María Cecilia; Soria, María A.; Bueno, Dante Javier; Godano, E. I.; Gómez, S.C.; et al.; Salmonella spp. contamination in commercial layer hen farms using different types of samples and detection methods; Poultry Science Association; Poultry Science; 96; 8; 31-8-2017; 2820-2830
dc.identifier.issn
0032-5791
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/63598
dc.description.abstract
The performance of detection methods (culture methods and polymerase chain reaction assay) and plating media used in the same type of samples were determined as well as the specificity of PCR primers to detected Salmonella spp. contamination in layer hen farms. Also, the association of farm characteristics with Salmonella presence was evaluated. Environmental samples (feces, feed, drinking water, air, bootswabs) and eggs were taken from 40 layer hen houses. Salmonella spp. was most detected in boot-swabs taken around the houses (30% and 35% by isolation and PCR, respectively) follow by fecal samples (15.2% and 13.6% by isolation and PCR, respectively). Eggs, drinking water, and air samples were negative for Salmonella detection. Salmonella Schwarzengrund and S. Enteritidis were the most isolated serotypes. For plating media, relative specificity was 1, and the relative sensitivity was greater for EF-18 agar than XLDT agar in feed and fecal samples. However, relative sensitivity was greater in XLDT agar than EF-18 agar for boot-swab samples. Agreement was between fair to good depending on the sample, and it was good between isolation and PCR (feces and boot-swabs), without agreement for feed samples. Salmonella spp. PCR was positive for all strains, while S. Typhimurium PCR was negative. Salmonella Enteritidis PCR used was not specific. Based in the multiple logistic regression analyses, categorization by counties was significant for Salmonella spp. presence (P-value = 0.010). This study shows the importance of considering different types of samples, plating media and detection methods during a Salmonella spp. monitoring study. In addition, it is important to incorporate the sampling of floors around the layer hen houses to learn if biosecurity measures should be strengthened to minimize the entry and spread of Salmonella in the houses. Also, the performance of some PCR methods and S. Enteritidis PCR should be improved, and biosecurity measures in hen farms must be reinforced in the region of more concentrated layer hen houses to reduce the probability of Salmonella spp. presence.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Poultry Science Association

dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Detection
dc.subject
Layer Hen Farm
dc.subject
Salmonella
dc.subject
Sampling
dc.subject.classification
Salud Ocupacional

dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Salud

dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Y DE LA SALUD

dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Veterinarias

dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias

dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS

dc.title
Salmonella spp. contamination in commercial layer hen farms using different types of samples and detection methods
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2018-10-23T17:29:11Z
dc.journal.volume
96
dc.journal.number
8
dc.journal.pagination
2820-2830
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido

dc.journal.ciudad
Oxford
dc.description.fil
Fil: Soria, María Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Rios; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Soria, María A.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Rios; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bueno, Dante Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Rios; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Godano, E. I.. Tecnovo S.A.; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gómez, S.C.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Rios; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: ViaButron, I. A.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Rios; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Padin, V. M.. Dirección Nacional de Instituto de Investigación. Administración Nacional de Laboratorio e Instituto de Salud “Dr. C. G. Malbrán”; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rogé, A. D.. Dirección Nacional de Instituto de Investigación. Administración Nacional de Laboratorio e Instituto de Salud “Dr. C. G. Malbrán”; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Poultry Science

dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex053
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/ps/article/96/8/2820/3096894
Archivos asociados