Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian
dc.contributor.author
Tohmé, Fernando Abel
dc.contributor.author
Auday, Marcelo Roberto
dc.date.available
2018-10-12T17:40:57Z
dc.date.issued
2017-05-09
dc.identifier.citation
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian; Tohmé, Fernando Abel; Auday, Marcelo Roberto; Collective argumentation: A survey of aggregation issues around argumentation frameworks; IOS Press; Argument and Computation; 8; 1; 9-5-2017; 1-34
dc.identifier.issn
1946-2166
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/62337
dc.description.abstract
Dung's argumentation frameworks have been applied for over twenty years to the analysis of argument justification. This representation focuses on arguments and the attacks among them, abstracting away from other features like the internal structure of arguments, the nature of utterers, the specifics of the attack relation, etc. The model is highly attractive because it reduces most of the complexities involved in argumentation processes. It can be applied to different settings, like the argument evaluation of an individual agent or the case of dialectic disputes between two agents (pro and con), or even in multi-Agent collective argumentation. The latter case involves agents with possibly different arguments and/or opinions on how to evaluate them, leading to the possibility of considering multiple sets of arguments and attack relations. Two basic questions can be asked here, namely 'what to aggregate' and 'how to aggregate'. The former concerns what kinds of entities do the agents intend to choose (arguments, attacks, assessments, etc.), while the second one focuses on which aggregation mechanisms yield rational choices (voting on arguments, merging procedures to obtain a common argumentation framework, deliberation processes, etc.). In particular, the question about the rationality of a collective argument choice relates this topic to Social Choice and Judgment Aggregation theories, while its associated strategic issues relate it to Game Theory. The research efforts on the disparate problems elicited by collective argumentation have generated a considerable corpus of literature that deserves an orderly evaluation. This survey is intended as a contribution to that end.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
IOS Press
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Argumentation Frameworks
dc.subject
Collective Argumentation
dc.subject
Deliberation
dc.subject
Game Theory
dc.subject
Judgment Aggregation
dc.subject
Merging Argumentation Systems
dc.subject
Multi-Agent Systems
dc.subject
Social Choice
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Computación
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Computación e Información
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS
dc.title
Collective argumentation: A survey of aggregation issues around argumentation frameworks
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2018-09-18T14:24:59Z
dc.identifier.eissn
1946-2174
dc.journal.volume
8
dc.journal.number
1
dc.journal.pagination
1-34
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Economía. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Tohmé, Fernando Abel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Matemática Bahía Blanca. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Matemática. Instituto de Matemática Bahía Blanca; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Auday, Marcelo Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Economía. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Argument and Computation
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://content.iospress.com/articles/argument-and-computation/aac014
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/AAC-160014