Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Cavalli, Camila María
dc.contributor.author
Carballo Pozzo Ardizzi, Fabricio
dc.contributor.author
Dzik, Marina Victoria
dc.contributor.author
Underwood, Susana
dc.contributor.author
Bentosela, Mariana
dc.date.available
2018-06-04T20:00:31Z
dc.date.issued
2018-01
dc.identifier.citation
Cavalli, Camila María; Carballo Pozzo Ardizzi, Fabricio; Dzik, Marina Victoria; Underwood, Susana; Bentosela, Mariana; Are animal-assisted activity dogs different from pet dogs? A comparison of their sociocognitive abilities; Elsevier Science Inc; Journal Of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications And Research; 23; 1-2018; 76-81
dc.identifier.issn
1558-7878
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/47214
dc.description.abstract
Animal assisted activities (AAA) refer to a variety of interactions between animals and humans, intended to improve people?s wellbeing providing recreational or educational opportunities. Domestic dogs are one of the most commonly used animals for these kinds of interventions, given their trainability and the positive effects of dog-human interactions. Nevertheless, the selection of participating animals is mainly unsystematic and training is not required for dogs to take part in AAA. Previous studies suggest that high sociability as well as reduced fear and aggression are desirable traits in AAA dogs. Yet, to our knowledge, there are no previous studies assessing the specific characteristics of dogs participating in AAA. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of AAA and pet dogs that live in the same household but do not participate in AAA. We assessed 17 dogs (9 participating in AAA in hospital settings, and 8 pets living in the same household ? control group) with a test battery comprising three behavioral tasks (sociability test, gazing test, and A-not-B task), and owner rated questionnaires (Dog Impulsivity Assessment Scale, ?DIAS?, and 4 subscales: Trainability, Fear to Strangers, Nonsocial fear and Attachment/Attention seeking of the Canine Behavioral Assessment and Research Questionnaire, ?C-BARQ?). Results of the gazing test indicate that, when dogs were not reinforced for looking at the human face, AAA dogs gazed longer at an unknown experimenter than pet dogs. Therefore, they showed an increased tendency to gaze at humans and persist on this communicative attempt when this response was not successful. Additionally, according to the DIAS score, AAA dogs would be less impulsive than the control group. No significant differences were found on the A-not-B task, the sociability test or CBARQ questionnaire. In conclusion, since these AAA dogs had not undergone specific training, the effects observed in the present work may be attributed, at least partially, to the learning experiences they had during AAA work. Overall, it would be important to take into account these characteristics for both the selection and training of these animals.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science Inc
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Animal
dc.subject
Assisted
dc.subject
Activities
dc.subject
Domestic
dc.subject
Dogs
dc.subject
Gazing
dc.subject
Test
dc.subject
Inhibitory
dc.subject
Control
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Biológicas
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS
dc.subject.classification
Psicología
dc.subject.classification
Psicología
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES
dc.title
Are animal-assisted activity dogs different from pet dogs? A comparison of their sociocognitive abilities
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2018-06-04T17:18:41Z
dc.journal.volume
23
dc.journal.pagination
76-81
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos
dc.journal.ciudad
Nueva York
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cavalli, Camila María. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Carballo Pozzo Ardizzi, Fabricio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas y Biomédicas del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia. Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas y Biomédicas del Sur; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Dzik, Marina Victoria. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Underwood, Susana. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bentosela, Mariana. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Journal Of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications And Research
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2017.12.001
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787817301508
Archivos asociados