Repositorio Institucional
Repositorio Institucional
CONICET Digital
  • Inicio
  • EXPLORAR
    • AUTORES
    • DISCIPLINAS
    • COMUNIDADES
  • Estadísticas
  • Novedades
    • Noticias
    • Boletines
  • Ayuda
    • General
    • Datos de investigación
  • Acerca de
    • CONICET Digital
    • Equipo
    • Red Federal
  • Contacto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
  • INFORMACIÓN GENERAL
  • RESUMEN
  • ESTADISTICAS
 
Artículo

Measuring the Benefits of Healthcare: DALYs and QALYs – Does the Choice of Measure Matter? A Case Study of Two Preventive Interventions

Augustovski, Federico ArielIcon ; Colantonio, Lisandro Damián; Galante, Julieta; Bardach, Ariel EstebanIcon ; Caporale, Joaquín E.; Zárate, Víctor; Chuang, Ling Hsiang; Pichón-Riviere, AndrésIcon ; Kind, Paul
Fecha de publicación: 01/2017
Editorial: Kerman University of Medical Sciences
Revista: International Journal of Health Policy and Management
ISSN: 2322-5939
Idioma: Inglés
Tipo de recurso: Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Salud Ocupacional

Resumen

Background The measurement of health benefits is a key issue in health economic evaluations. There is very scarce empirical literature exploring the differences of using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) or disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) as benefit metrics and their potential impact in decision-making. Methods Two previously published models delivering outputs in QALYs, were adapted to estimate DALYs: a Markov model for human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination, and a pneumococcal vaccination deterministic model (PNEUMO). Argentina, Chile, and the United Kingdom studies were used, where local EQ-5D social value weights were available to provide local QALY weights. A primary study with descriptive vignettes was done (n = 73) to obtain EQ-5D data for all health states included in both models. Several scenario analyses were carried-out to evaluate the relative importance of using different metrics (DALYS or QALYs) to estimate health benefits on these economic evaluations. Results QALY gains were larger than DALYs avoided in all countries for HPV, leading to more favorable decisions using the former. With discounting and age-weighting – scenario with greatest differences in all countries – incremental DALYs avoided represented the 75%, 68%, and 43% of the QALYs gained in Argentina, Chile, and United Kingdom respectively. Differences using QALYs or DALYs were less consistent and sometimes in the opposite direction for PNEUMO. These differences, similar to other widely used assumptions, could directly influence decision-making using usual gross domestic products (GDPs) per capita per DALY or QALY thresholds. Conclusion We did not find evidence that contradicts current practice of many researchers and decision-makers of using QALYs or DALYs interchangeably. Differences attributed to the choice of metric could influence final decisions, but similarly to other frequently used assumptions.
Palabras clave: Qaly , Daly
Ver el registro completo
 
Archivos asociados
Thumbnail
 
Tamaño: 1.261Mb
Formato: PDF
.
Descargar
Licencia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Unported (CC BY 2.5)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/44801
URL: http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3356_0.html
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/IJHPM.2017.47
Colecciones
Articulos(CIESP)
Articulos de CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES EN EPIDEMIOLOGIA Y SALUD PUBLICA
Citación
Augustovski, Federico Ariel; Colantonio, Lisandro Damián; Galante, Julieta; Bardach, Ariel Esteban; Caporale, Joaquín E.; et al.; Measuring the Benefits of Healthcare: DALYs and QALYs – Does the Choice of Measure Matter? A Case Study of Two Preventive Interventions; Kerman University of Medical Sciences; International Journal of Health Policy and Management; 7; 2; 1-2017; 120-136
Compartir
Altmétricas
 

Enviar por e-mail
Separar cada destinatario (hasta 5) con punto y coma.
  • Facebook
  • X Conicet Digital
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Sound Cloud
  • LinkedIn

Los contenidos del CONICET están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License

https://www.conicet.gov.ar/ - CONICET

Inicio

Explorar

  • Autores
  • Disciplinas
  • Comunidades

Estadísticas

Novedades

  • Noticias
  • Boletines

Ayuda

Acerca de

  • CONICET Digital
  • Equipo
  • Red Federal

Contacto

Godoy Cruz 2290 (C1425FQB) CABA – República Argentina – Tel: +5411 4899-5400 repositorio@conicet.gov.ar
TÉRMINOS Y CONDICIONES