Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Mazzoni, Agustina  
dc.contributor.author
Althabe, Fernando  
dc.contributor.author
Gutierrez, Laura  
dc.contributor.author
Gibbons, Luz  
dc.contributor.author
Liu, Nancy H.  
dc.contributor.author
Bonotti, Ana María  
dc.contributor.author
Izbizky, Gustavo H.  
dc.contributor.author
Ferrary, Marta  
dc.contributor.author
Viergue, Nora  
dc.contributor.author
Vigil, Silvia I.  
dc.contributor.author
Zalazar Denett, Gabriela  
dc.contributor.author
Belizan, Jose  
dc.date.available
2018-05-02T16:52:42Z  
dc.date.issued
2016-02  
dc.identifier.citation
Mazzoni, Agustina; Althabe, Fernando; Gutierrez, Laura; Gibbons, Luz; Liu, Nancy H.; et al.; Women’s preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study; BioMed Central; BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth; 16; 1; 2-2016  
dc.identifier.issn
1471-2393  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/43857  
dc.description.abstract
Background Rates of caesarean section have steadily increased in most middle- and high-income countries over the last few decades without medical justification. Maternal request is one of the frequently cited non-medical factors contributing to this trend. The objectives of this study were to assess pregnant women’s preferences regarding mode of delivery and to compare actual caesarean section rates in the public and private sectors. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted in two public and three private hospitals in Buenos Aires, Argentina. 382 nulliparous pregnant women (183 from the private sector and 199 from the public sector) aged 18 to 35 years, with single pregnancies over 32 weeks of gestational age were enrolled during antenatal care visits between October 2010 and September 2011. We excluded women with pregnancies resulting from assisted fertility, women with known pre-existing major diseases or, with pregnancy complications, or with a medical indication of elective cesarean section. We used two different approaches to assess women’s preferences: a survey using a tailored questionnaire, and a discrete choice experiment. Results Only 8 and 6 % of the healthy nulliparous women in the public and private sectors, respectively, expressed a preference for caesarean section. Fear of pain and safety were the most frequently expressed reasons for preferring caesarean section. When reasons for delivery mode were assessed by a discrete choice experiment, women placed the most emphasis on sex after childbirth. Of women who expressed their preference for vaginal delivery, 34 and 40 % ended their pregnancies by caesarean section in public and private hospitals, respectively. Conclusions The preference for caesarean section is low among healthy nulliparous women in Buenos Aires. The reasons why these women had a rate of more than 35 % caesarean sections are unlikely related to their preferences for mode of delivery.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
BioMed Central  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Caesarean Section  
dc.subject
Childbirth  
dc.subject
Choice  
dc.subject
Obstetric  
dc.subject
Preference  
dc.subject.classification
Medicina Critica y de Emergencia  
dc.subject.classification
Medicina Clínica  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Y DE LA SALUD  
dc.title
Women’s preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2018-04-27T14:01:21Z  
dc.identifier.eissn
0968-8080  
dc.journal.volume
16  
dc.journal.number
1  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mazzoni, Agustina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Althabe, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gutierrez, Laura. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gibbons, Luz. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Liu, Nancy H.. UCSF General Internal Medicine; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bonotti, Ana María. Ministerio de Salud de la Nación; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Izbizky, Gustavo H.. Hospital Italiano; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ferrary, Marta. Hospital Magdalena; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Viergue, Nora. Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas “Norberto Quirno”; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Vigil, Silvia I.. Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Zalazar Denett, Gabriela. Hospital Materno Infantil Dr. Carlos Gianantonio; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Belizan, Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0824-0  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-016-0824-0