Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Nguyen, Lan-Anh  
dc.contributor.author
Gencer, Umit  
dc.contributor.author
Goudot, Guillaume  
dc.contributor.author
Craiem, Damian  
dc.contributor.author
Casciaro, Mariano Ezequiel  
dc.contributor.author
Cheng, Charles  
dc.contributor.author
Messas, Emmanuel  
dc.contributor.author
Mousseaux, Elie  
dc.contributor.author
Soulat, Gilles  
dc.date.available
2025-05-13T10:05:53Z  
dc.date.issued
2024-12  
dc.identifier.citation
Nguyen, Lan-Anh; Gencer, Umit; Goudot, Guillaume; Craiem, Damian; Casciaro, Mariano Ezequiel; et al.; Flow quantification within the aortic ejection tract using 4D flow cardiac MRI in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: Implications for the assessment of aortic regurgitation; Elsevier; Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging; 105; 12; 12-2024; 498-506  
dc.identifier.issn
2211-5684  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/261200  
dc.description.abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiac MRI in quantifying aortic flow in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Materials and methods: Patients with BAV who underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and 4D flow cardiac MRI were prospectively included. Aortic flow was quantified using two-dimensional phase contrast velocimetry at the sinotubular junction and in the ascending aorta and using 4D flow in the regurgitant jet, in theleft ventricular outflow tract, at the aortic annulus, the sinotubular junction, and the ascending aorta, with or without anatomical tracking. Flow quantification was compared with ventricular volumes, pulmonary flow using Pearson correlation test, bias and limits of agreement (LOA) using Bland Altman method, and with multiparametric transthoracic echocardiography quantification using weighted kappa test.Results: Eighty-eight patients (63 men, 25 women) with a mean age of 50.5 ± 14.8 (standard deviation) years (age range: 20.8–78.3) were included. Changes in flow with or without tracking were modest (< 5 mL). The best correlation was obtained at the aortic annulus for forward volume (r = 0.84; LOA [-28.4; 25.3] mL) and at the regurgitant jet and sinotubular junction for regurgitant volume (r = 0.68; LOA [-27.8; 33.8] and r = 0.69; LOA [-28.6; 24.2] mL). A combined approach for regurgitant fraction and net volume calculations using forward volume measured at ANN and regurgitant volume at sinotubular junction performed better than each level taken separately (r = 0.90; LOA [-20.7; 10.0] mL and r = 0.48, LOA [-33.8; 33.4] %). The agreement between transthoracic echocardiography and 4D flow cardiac MRI for aortic regurgitation grading was poor (kappa, 0.13 to 0.42).Conclusion: In patients with BAV, aortic flow quantification by 4D flow cardiac MRI is the most accurate at the annulus for the forward volume, and at the sinotubular junction or directly in the jet for the regurgitant volume.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
4D FLOW CARDIAC MRI  
dc.subject
AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY  
dc.subject
BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE DISEASE  
dc.subject
CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ingeniería Médica  
dc.subject.classification
Ingeniería Médica  
dc.subject.classification
INGENIERÍAS Y TECNOLOGÍAS  
dc.title
Flow quantification within the aortic ejection tract using 4D flow cardiac MRI in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: Implications for the assessment of aortic regurgitation  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2025-05-09T15:57:51Z  
dc.journal.volume
105  
dc.journal.number
12  
dc.journal.pagination
498-506  
dc.journal.pais
Francia  
dc.journal.ciudad
Paris  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Nguyen, Lan-Anh. Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou; Francia. Inserm; Francia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gencer, Umit. Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou; Francia. Inserm; Francia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Goudot, Guillaume. Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou; Francia. Inserm; Francia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Craiem, Damian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Casciaro, Mariano Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cheng, Charles. Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou; Francia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Messas, Emmanuel. Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou; Francia. Inserm; Francia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mousseaux, Elie. Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou; Francia. Inserm; Francia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Soulat, Gilles. Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou; Francia. Inserm; Francia  
dc.journal.title
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2211568424001943  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2024.09.001