Artículo
Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria
Fecha de publicación:
10/2012
Editorial:
IOS Press
Revista:
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
ISSN:
0922-6389
Idioma:
Inglés
Tipo de recurso:
Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Resumen
In this work, we develop a game-theoretic framework in which pro and con arguments are put forward. This framework intends to capture winning strategies for different defense criteria. In turn, each possible extension semantics satisfies a particular defense criterion. To ensure that only semantics satisfying given criteria are obtained, protocols for playing have to be defined, being the ensuing winning strategies full characterizations of the corresponding criteria. Admissibility and strong admissibility are two of those criteria proposed in the literature for the evaluation of extension semantics; here, we also introduce two weaker criteria, pairwise and weak cogency, for the evaluation of non-admissible semantics, and we define specific game protocolscapturing them.
Archivos asociados
Licencia
Identificadores
Colecciones
Articulos(CCT - BAHIA BLANCA)
Articulos de CTRO.CIENTIFICO TECNOL.CONICET - BAHIA BLANCA
Articulos de CTRO.CIENTIFICO TECNOL.CONICET - BAHIA BLANCA
Citación
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian; Tohmé, Fernando Abel; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria; IOS Press; Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; 245; 1; 10-2012; 153-164
Compartir
Altmétricas