Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Manzano, Fernando  
dc.contributor.other
Celemin, Juan Pablo  
dc.contributor.other
Velázquez, Guillermo Ángel  
dc.date.available
2022-07-08T10:24:16Z  
dc.date.issued
2022  
dc.identifier.citation
Manzano, Fernando; Traditions and Plurality of Definitions in Thinking About Poverty; Springer; 2022; 1-20  
dc.identifier.isbn
978-3-030-94410-0  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/161654  
dc.description.abstract
Throughout history, poverty has been an issue of concern, and different traditions have emerged. There have been important variations in the significance of poverty in different types of society and in different periods. Many of these are present today. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, mainly in the societies that were more advanced in the Industrial Revolution, the appearance of new factors of production led to the loss ofmeans of subsistence and employment and consequently poverty increased massively. In the following decades, economic development in the industrial nations raised the living standards of the working class. But the crisis of the 1930s led to an increase in unemployment. The world’s leading capitalist economy resorted for the first time to state intervention. Far from advancing through international cooperation, the countries responded with protectionist measures and economic policies to confront the crisis. After the notable post-war prosperity, the persistence of poor minorities in prosperous societies becamemore visible, while the process of decolonization in peripheral societies brought awareness of the inequality of poverty. Liberal economists believed that it was possible to eradicate poverty in developing countries with sustained economic growth over time. The persistence of mass poverty, however, demanded a conceptualization of the term. This led to various formulations regarding the problem of poverty. The different definitions incorpórate the discretion of the assessments on which they are based. The choice of a particular definition of poverty implies assuming a certain political connotation, as well as certain development strategies to improve the situation of lower income groups.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Springer  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
POVERTY  
dc.subject
DEFINITIONS  
dc.subject
CONCEPTUAL EVOLUTION  
dc.subject.classification
Sociología  
dc.subject.classification
Sociología  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES  
dc.title
Traditions and Plurality of Definitions in Thinking About Poverty  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro  
dc.date.updated
2022-07-04T20:16:27Z  
dc.journal.pagination
1-20  
dc.journal.pais
Suiza  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Manzano, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Instituto de Geografía, Historia y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Geografía, Historia y Ciencias Sociales; Argentina  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-94411-7_1  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94411-7_1  
dc.conicet.paginas
353  
dc.source.titulo
Inequities and Quality of Life in Argentina: Geography and Quality of Life in Argentina