Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Manzano, Fernando
dc.contributor.other
Celemin, Juan Pablo
dc.contributor.other
Velázquez, Guillermo Ángel
dc.date.available
2022-07-08T10:24:16Z
dc.date.issued
2022
dc.identifier.citation
Manzano, Fernando; Traditions and Plurality of Definitions in Thinking About Poverty; Springer; 2022; 1-20
dc.identifier.isbn
978-3-030-94410-0
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/161654
dc.description.abstract
Throughout history, poverty has been an issue of concern, and different traditions have emerged. There have been important variations in the significance of poverty in different types of society and in different periods. Many of these are present today. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, mainly in the societies that were more advanced in the Industrial Revolution, the appearance of new factors of production led to the loss ofmeans of subsistence and employment and consequently poverty increased massively. In the following decades, economic development in the industrial nations raised the living standards of the working class. But the crisis of the 1930s led to an increase in unemployment. The world’s leading capitalist economy resorted for the first time to state intervention. Far from advancing through international cooperation, the countries responded with protectionist measures and economic policies to confront the crisis. After the notable post-war prosperity, the persistence of poor minorities in prosperous societies becamemore visible, while the process of decolonization in peripheral societies brought awareness of the inequality of poverty. Liberal economists believed that it was possible to eradicate poverty in developing countries with sustained economic growth over time. The persistence of mass poverty, however, demanded a conceptualization of the term. This led to various formulations regarding the problem of poverty. The different definitions incorpórate the discretion of the assessments on which they are based. The choice of a particular definition of poverty implies assuming a certain political connotation, as well as certain development strategies to improve the situation of lower income groups.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Springer
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
POVERTY
dc.subject
DEFINITIONS
dc.subject
CONCEPTUAL EVOLUTION
dc.subject.classification
Sociología
dc.subject.classification
Sociología
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES
dc.title
Traditions and Plurality of Definitions in Thinking About Poverty
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro
dc.date.updated
2022-07-04T20:16:27Z
dc.journal.pagination
1-20
dc.journal.pais
Suiza
dc.description.fil
Fil: Manzano, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Instituto de Geografía, Historia y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Geografía, Historia y Ciencias Sociales; Argentina
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-94411-7_1
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94411-7_1
dc.conicet.paginas
353
dc.source.titulo
Inequities and Quality of Life in Argentina: Geography and Quality of Life in Argentina
Archivos asociados