Repositorio Institucional
Repositorio Institucional
CONICET Digital
  • Inicio
  • EXPLORAR
    • AUTORES
    • DISCIPLINAS
    • COMUNIDADES
  • Estadísticas
  • Novedades
    • Noticias
    • Boletines
  • Ayuda
    • General
    • Datos de investigación
  • Acerca de
    • CONICET Digital
    • Equipo
    • Red Federal
  • Contacto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
  • INFORMACIÓN GENERAL
  • RESUMEN
  • ESTADISTICAS
 
Artículo

The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truth

Barry, Amadou; Bottasso, Oscar AdelmoIcon ; Vicco, Miguel HernánIcon
Fecha de publicación: 01/2019
Editorial: Future Medicine
Revista: Immunotherapy
ISSN: 1750-743X
Idioma: Inglés
Tipo de recurso: Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Otras Medicina Clínica

Resumen

The sociologist Robert Merton postulated that science is a concept used in order to denote the set of methods used to verify the truth of knowledge. Science is to go beyond empiricism, and try to make real hypothetical concepts (or check their shortcomings). In this line, Pierre Louis introduced the numerical method to achieve scientific ‘verification’ of the medical practice – “As to different methods of treatment, it is possible for us to assure ourselves of the superiority of one or other [. . . ] by enquiring if under these circumstances, a greater number of individuals have been cured by one means than another. Here again it is necessary to count. And it is, in great part at least, because hitherto this method has been not at all, or rarely been employed, that the science of therapeutics is so uncertain” [1]. The principal objective pursued through this method was to avoid treatments whose efficacies were not really proven...
Palabras clave: ANTIVACCINES , POST TRUTH , PREVENTIVE MEDICINE , PUBLIC HEALTH , VACCINES
Ver el registro completo
 
Archivos asociados
Thumbnail
 
Tamaño: 636.4Kb
Formato: PDF
.
Descargar
Licencia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/149469
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/imt-2018-0062
URL: https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/10.2217/imt-2018-0062
Colecciones
Articulos(CCT - ROSARIO)
Articulos de CTRO.CIENTIFICO TECNOL.CONICET - ROSARIO
Articulos(IDICER)
Articulos de INSTITUTO DE INMUNOLOGIA CLINICA Y EXPERIMENTAL DE ROSARIO
Citación
Barry, Amadou; Bottasso, Oscar Adelmo; Vicco, Miguel Hernán; The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truth; Future Medicine; Immunotherapy; 11; 1; 1-2019; 7-9
Compartir
Altmétricas
 

Enviar por e-mail
Separar cada destinatario (hasta 5) con punto y coma.
  • Facebook
  • X Conicet Digital
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Sound Cloud
  • LinkedIn

Los contenidos del CONICET están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License

https://www.conicet.gov.ar/ - CONICET

Inicio

Explorar

  • Autores
  • Disciplinas
  • Comunidades

Estadísticas

Novedades

  • Noticias
  • Boletines

Ayuda

Acerca de

  • CONICET Digital
  • Equipo
  • Red Federal

Contacto

Godoy Cruz 2290 (C1425FQB) CABA – República Argentina – Tel: +5411 4899-5400 repositorio@conicet.gov.ar
TÉRMINOS Y CONDICIONES