Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Démoulin, Pascal  
dc.contributor.author
Dasso, Sergio Ricardo  
dc.contributor.author
Janvier, M.  
dc.date.available
2017-05-29T15:05:11Z  
dc.date.issued
2013-01  
dc.identifier.citation
Démoulin, Pascal; Dasso, Sergio Ricardo; Janvier, M.; Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds?; Edp Sciences; Astronomy And Astrophysics; 550; 1-2013; A3,1-15  
dc.identifier.issn
0004-6361  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/17053  
dc.description.abstract
Context. Magnetic clouds (MCs) are a subset of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs). One property of MCs is the presence of a magnetic flux rope. Is the difference between ICMEs with and without MCs intrinsic or rather due to an observational bias? Aims. As the spacecraft has no relationship with the MC trajectory, the frequency distribution of MCs versus the spacecraft distance to the MCs’ axis is expected to be approximately flat. However, Lepping & Wu (2010, Ann. Geophys., 28, 1539) confirmed that it is a strongly decreasing function of the estimated impact parameter. Is a flux rope more frequently undetected for larger impact parameter? Methods. In order to answer the questions above, we explore the parameter space of flux rope models, especially the aspect ratio, boundary shape, and current distribution. The proposed models are analyzed as MCs by fitting a circular linear force-free field to the magnetic field computed along simulated crossings. Results. We find that the distribution of the twist within the flux rope and the non-detection due to too low field rotation angle or magnitude only weakly affect the expected frequency distribution of MCs versus impact parameter. However, the estimated impact parameter is increasingly biased to lower values as the flux rope cross section is more elongated orthogonally to the crossing trajectory. The observed distribution of MCs is a natural consequence of a flux rope cross section flattened on average by a factor 2 to 3 depending on the magnetic twist profile. However, the faster MCs at 1 AU, with V > 550 km s-1, present an almost uniform distribution of MCs vs. impact parameter, which is consistent with round-shaped flux ropes, in contrast with the slower ones. Conclusions. We conclude that the sampling of MCs at various distances from the axis does not significantly affect their detection. The large part of ICMEs without MCs could be due to a too strict criteria for MCs or to the fact that these ICMEs are encountered outside their flux rope or near the leg region, or they do not contain a flux rope.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Edp Sciences  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Sun: Coronal Mass Ejections (Cmes)  
dc.subject
Sun: Heliosphere  
dc.subject
Magnetic Fields  
dc.subject
Solar-Terrestrial Relations  
dc.subject.classification
Astronomía  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Físicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds?  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2017-05-23T19:17:01Z  
dc.journal.volume
550  
dc.journal.pagination
A3,1-15  
dc.journal.pais
Francia  
dc.journal.ciudad
Paris  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Démoulin, Pascal. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Observatoire de Paris; Francia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Dasso, Sergio Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciónes Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio. - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Janvier, M.. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Observatoire de Paris; Francia  
dc.journal.title
Astronomy And Astrophysics  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220535  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.5343  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2013/02/aa20535-12/aa20535-12.html